2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1148-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Analysis of Designed Experiments, Third Edition

Abstract: except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0
11

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
57
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to validate our results and the performance of the ICC algorithm proposed here, we evaluated the statistical significance of the error rates for the context-independent classification (ε ci ) versus that obtained after the application of the ICC algorithm (ε cd ) [27]. We Table 2 the summary of results for our work; a multilayer perceptron with a reduced-sized output layer proposed in [11]; a standard multilayer perceptron with one hidden layer proposed in [10]; and a hierarchical system that classifies the patterns firstly in 7 major groups of classes, and then in one of the 24 karyotype classes, proposed in [16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In order to validate our results and the performance of the ICC algorithm proposed here, we evaluated the statistical significance of the error rates for the context-independent classification (ε ci ) versus that obtained after the application of the ICC algorithm (ε cd ) [27]. We Table 2 the summary of results for our work; a multilayer perceptron with a reduced-sized output layer proposed in [11]; a standard multilayer perceptron with one hidden layer proposed in [10]; and a hierarchical system that classifies the patterns firstly in 7 major groups of classes, and then in one of the 24 karyotype classes, proposed in [16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the case of the experimented data, noise is not important in the audio signals, so the inclusion of the derivatives only results in greater complexity of the classifier, without adding meaningful information for discriminating the emotions. The statistical significance of the results was evaluated considering the probability that the classification error of a given classifier ε (deep network) is smaller than the one of the reference system ε re f (MLP) [16]. The statistical independence of the errors for each pattern was assumed and the binomial distribution of the errors was modeled by means of a Gaussian distribution.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the value of variance, the t-test (if variances were equal) or Cochran and Cox tests (if variances were not equal) were used to study the differences between mean measures of teeth (Snedecor & Cochran, 1972;Toutenburg, 2002). For each comparison, the effect size (ES) per Cohen's d value (standardized difference between two groups) was measured.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%