2013
DOI: 10.5194/hess-17-1445-2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical analysis of error propagation from radar rainfall to hydrological models

Abstract: Abstract. This study attempts to characterise the manner with which inherent error in radar rainfall estimates input influence the character of the stream flow simulation uncertainty in validated hydrological modelling. An artificial statistical error model described by Gaussian distribution was developed to generate realisations of possible combinations of normalised errors and normalised bias to reflect the identified radar error and temporal dependence. These realisations were embedded in the 5 km/15 min UK… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The soil within the catchment is prevalently clay loam but with a relatively high spatial variability represented by 29 soil units (polygons) of different size within the catchment. All these data are discretized to a spatial resolu-tion of 100 m × 100 m. Readers interested in more details on data set and the processing may refer to Kumar et al (2010), Samaniego et al (2010b) and Zink et al (2017). The spatial distributions of cumulative rain, potential evapotranspiration, land use and the mean annual leaf area index are shown in the Supplement (see Fig.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil within the catchment is prevalently clay loam but with a relatively high spatial variability represented by 29 soil units (polygons) of different size within the catchment. All these data are discretized to a spatial resolu-tion of 100 m × 100 m. Readers interested in more details on data set and the processing may refer to Kumar et al (2010), Samaniego et al (2010b) and Zink et al (2017). The spatial distributions of cumulative rain, potential evapotranspiration, land use and the mean annual leaf area index are shown in the Supplement (see Fig.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the study cases available in the literature deal with the propagation of RR uncertainty through large river catchments (see e.g. Borga, 2002;Vivoni et al, 2007;Collier, 2009;Zhu et al, 2013) and little is known about the way the RR uncertainty propagates on simulated flow peaks/volumes in urban drainage systems. Schellart et al (2012) showed that for a small urban catchment, large differences are observed in the flow peaks simulated by radar and raingauges due to the inherent uncertainties from both rainfall estimates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weather radar rainfall error modeling was well presented in the previous reports [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. Hardware sources of errors are related to electronics stability, antenna accuracy, and signal processing accuracy studied by [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%