2004
DOI: 10.1051/animres:2004016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical analysis of somatic cell scores via mixed model methodology for longitudinal data

Abstract: -The aim of this study was to analyze somatic cell counts which is an indirect criterion. to assess susceptibility to mastitis. Data analyzed were weekly records (6448 somatic cell scores) out of 159 primiparous Holsteins and Holsteins x Normande cows raised at the INRA" Le Pin au Haras" experimental farm, France. Given the longitudinal structure of this data set, the analysis consists of modeling both the mean and the individual profiles. This was achieved via the use of mixed models including fixed effects f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a first step, for each trait, a variance-covariance matrix was assumed and a model for the mean was chosen by selecting fixed effects via the robust estimators proposed by Liang and Zeger (1986). After selection of the fixed effects, the second step consisted of selecting and testing several covariance structures for animal and residual effects, following the strategy and methodology used by Robert-Granie et al (2004). To account for the correlation of measures within subjects (longitudinal recording), 5 R matrix covariance structures were tested (Table 1).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a first step, for each trait, a variance-covariance matrix was assumed and a model for the mean was chosen by selecting fixed effects via the robust estimators proposed by Liang and Zeger (1986). After selection of the fixed effects, the second step consisted of selecting and testing several covariance structures for animal and residual effects, following the strategy and methodology used by Robert-Granie et al (2004). To account for the correlation of measures within subjects (longitudinal recording), 5 R matrix covariance structures were tested (Table 1).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For traits measured for each udder half (SCS and bacteriological results), modeling the covariance structure of the random animal part (G matrix) aimed at testing different variances for each udder half and the correlation between udder halves (Table 1). Selection of the best models was based on the Akaike criteria for nonnested models and on the likelihood ratio test when models were nested, as proposed by Robert-Granie et al (2004).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the somatic cell count (SCC) as an indicator of the inflammatory response to an intramammary infection or another trigger of the immune system is a convenient (and commonly used) measure of udder health as well as milk quality (Rivas et al 2001, Schukken et al 2003, Green et al 2004, Robert-Granie et al 2004, de Haas et al 2005, Hillerton & Berry 2005. Moreover, various mastitis control programmes developed throughout the world, those aimed at genetic selection for mastitis resistance included, are almost all based on the use of this criterion (Shook 1993, Hillerton 1996, Kadarmideen & Pryce 2001, Beaudeau et al 2002, Samoré et al 2003, Barnouin et al 2004, Juozaitiene et al 2004, Kadarmideen 2004.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7, when the order is 10 ∼ 40, the MSE is smaller, and that means the performance is better. When the order is higher than 40, the MSE increases because of the waviness and endeffects [21]. The lower the order is, the less the computation is, so the order n = 10 in this paper.…”
Section: Fingerprint Extractionmentioning
confidence: 97%