2005
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.200400560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Evaluation of Single Nano‐Object Fluorescence

Abstract: Single nano-objects display strong fluctuations of their fluorescence signals. These random and irreproducible variations must be subject to statistical analysis to provide microscopic information. We review the main evaluation methods used so far by experimentalists in the field of single-molecule spectroscopy: time traces, correlation functions, distributions of "on" and "off" times, higher-order correlations. We compare their advantages and weaknesses from a theoretical point of view, illustrating our main … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
132
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 201 publications
(235 reference statements)
3
132
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Individual fluorescent molecules can now be detected routinely (43); yet, to realize the full potential of single-molecule spectroscopy and imaging, it is important to go beyond simple visualization when analyzing and interpreting data from these experiments (44). This report represents the application of several recent developments in fluorescence single-molecule techniques based on information theory that use the information carried by each detected photon in an unbiased way (31,32,45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual fluorescent molecules can now be detected routinely (43); yet, to realize the full potential of single-molecule spectroscopy and imaging, it is important to go beyond simple visualization when analyzing and interpreting data from these experiments (44). This report represents the application of several recent developments in fluorescence single-molecule techniques based on information theory that use the information carried by each detected photon in an unbiased way (31,32,45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the various analysis methods (Lippitz et al 2005) yielding often different types of information, an obvious question arises: is a particular method analysing the data efficiently, and what is the limit on the amount of information that can be extracted from given data with certain noise level? The answers are being sought using the concepts of information theory, such as Shannon information, entropy, mutual information or Fisher information (Watkins & Yang 2004;Talaga 2006).…”
Section: Single-point Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While autocorrelation has the advantages of allowing information to be extracted at relatively low signal-to-noise ratios, real-time autocorrelation traditionally has required dedicated, relatively expensive hardware. In addition, there is the assumption that the process is stationary (Krichevsky, 2002;Lippitz, 2005). A third method involves plotting the distribution of delays (Lippitz, 2005), alternatively denoted as the photo arrival time histogram (PART) (Fore, 2005), obtained from timecorrelated single-photon counting (TCSPC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there is the assumption that the process is stationary (Krichevsky, 2002;Lippitz, 2005). A third method involves plotting the distribution of delays (Lippitz, 2005), alternatively denoted as the photo arrival time histogram (PART) (Fore, 2005), obtained from timecorrelated single-photon counting (TCSPC). While powerful, this technique requires expensive hardware designed explicitly for TCSPC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%