1973
DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176342377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Inference in Bernoulli Trials with Dependence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this assumption breaks down as correlations will develop between the status of neighbouring nodes, as new infections are bound to be the neighbours of their infectors. [18]. This explanation makes it much easier to see which kinds of network structure are assumed during momemt closure, and how different closures are related to each other.…”
Section: Moment Closuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this assumption breaks down as correlations will develop between the status of neighbouring nodes, as new infections are bound to be the neighbours of their infectors. [18]. This explanation makes it much easier to see which kinds of network structure are assumed during momemt closure, and how different closures are related to each other.…”
Section: Moment Closuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clustering. To introduce clustering to the trials, we consider the method of Klotz [13] (and the parametrization of Lindqvist [14]) for generation of D m . In this construction, the n individuals canvassed have states fX i g i¼1, .…”
Section: Canvassing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, f corresponds to the mean of Bernoulli trials with Markov dependence. From Klotz (1973), we have that √ n( f − f ) converges in distribution to a centered Gaussian model, and thus √ n( p (F) − p) by the Delta Method, as n → ∞. For more details, see Ferreira (2012).…”
Section: Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%