1986
DOI: 10.1063/1.451853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical mechanics of helical worm-like chains. XV. Excluded-volume effects

Abstract: The expansion factors for the mean-square end-to-end distance and radius of gyration are studied for the helical worm-like (HW) chain with the excluded-volume effects incorporated in the Yamakawa–Stockmayer scheme. In this scheme, approximate closed expressions for them are expressed in terms of the excluded-volume parameter z and the first-order perturbation coefficient K(L) as a function of the total contour length L of the chain. The ring-closure probabilities necessary for the evaluation of K(L) are evalua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
95
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences were at most a few %; note that ½ 0 is insensitive to q (or q app ) for very short chains, for which excluded-volume effects are negligible. At 0.5 M, q app appreciably decreases only for low M and the effect on [] is insignificant throughout the entire C and the theoretical curves computed from the theory of Yoshizaki et al 23 for unperturbed wormlike touched-bead chains and the QTP theory [12][13][14] (eqs 1-6) for excluded-volume effects. For clarity, the theoretical values (discrete for low molecular weights) at the respective salt concentrations are represented by continuous solid lines and those for one and two beads are connected by dashed straight lines.…”
Section: Chain Stiffness and Excluded-volume Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The differences were at most a few %; note that ½ 0 is insensitive to q (or q app ) for very short chains, for which excluded-volume effects are negligible. At 0.5 M, q app appreciably decreases only for low M and the effect on [] is insignificant throughout the entire C and the theoretical curves computed from the theory of Yoshizaki et al 23 for unperturbed wormlike touched-bead chains and the QTP theory [12][13][14] (eqs 1-6) for excluded-volume effects. For clarity, the theoretical values (discrete for low molecular weights) at the respective salt concentrations are represented by continuous solid lines and those for one and two beads are connected by dashed straight lines.…”
Section: Chain Stiffness and Excluded-volume Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We analyze the viscosity data in Figure 6 by a combination of Yoshizaki et al's theory 23 for the intrinsic viscosity ½ 0 of an unperturbed wormlike touchedbead chain and the QTP theory [12][13][14] for the viscosity expansion factor . The former theory contains three parameters, the (total) persistence length q, the contour length L, and the bead diameter d; L is related to the molecular weight M by M=M L , with M L being the molar mass per unit contour length of the chain.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Comparison With Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The conventional theory of the excluded-volume effect, i.e., the two-parameter (TP) theory [10] based on the Gaussian chain model, has been confirmed to be valid only in a restricted range of extremely large M where effects of chain stiffness on the excludedvolume effect is not important. On the other hand, the theory [1,[21][22][23] based on the HW model, which takes account of both effects of excluded-volume and chain stiffness, may be valid over a wide range of M including the oligomer region. Within the framework of the HW theory, all the expansion factors (intramolecular excluded-volume effect) including a S may be described by the quasi-twoparameter (QTP) theory, which claims that they are ARTICLE IN PRESS and 0 in the limits of lL !…”
Section: Gyration-radius Expansion Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first term on the right-hand side of Equation (11) where K(lL) is a known function. 3,22 The second term on the right-hand side of Equation (11) may be expressed as 12 …”
Section: Third Virial Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%