The prospect of double layer capacitors
relies on the high specific
surface area provided by microporosity of carbon. Since there is not
enough space within narrow micropores for forming a double layer,
recent theoretical/computational studies have aimed at explaining
the mechanism in micropores. The problem is that the available models
suggest substantial differences in the mechanism of energy storage
by microporous and other types of carbon, but the electrochemical
behaviors are similar to a significant degree. Here, a conceptual
model is proposed empirically, which is in full agreement with the
experimental data reported in the literature, to reasonably explain
a universal mechanism of all carbon-based capacitors including microporous,
mesoporous, graphene, etc. It is described that none of the available
models for double layer charging from Helmholtz to Graham is valid
for carbon-based capacitors, as no double layer is formed within the
micropores, as well as the partial contribution of double layer charging
in larger pores or on graphene sheets. The mechanism of charge accumulation
in supercapacitors is based on the adsorption of electroactive species
over active sites of the carbon nanomaterial, and the surface diffusion
of the adsorbed species collects the charge over the high surface
area of carbon. The rate-determining step is usually controlled by
the availability of active sites, which defines the rate capability
of supercapacitors. This explains why the rate capability of double
layer capacitors is much lower than the theoretical expectations,
and why the alignment of graphene sheets results in fast performance
in the so-called kilohertz supercapacitors. Any factors, such as narrow
pores and irregularities, slowing down the subsequent surface diffusion
cause the deviation from ideal capacitive behavior. The present paper
attempts to highlight two points: surface diffusion might be a critical
step in the mechanism of supercapacitors (probably a rate-determining
step) and if narrow micropores exhibit capacitive behavior without
forming a double layer, larger pores may do the same since no sudden
change in the capacitive behavior with response to the pore size is
observed (to represent a crucial change in the mechanism).