2000
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.1.518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical methods for characterizing similarities and differences between semantic structures

Abstract: This paper describes a variety of statistical methods for obtaining precise quantitative estimates of the similarities and differences in the structures of semantic domains in different languages. The methods include comparing mean correlations within and between groups, principal components analysis of interspeaker correlations, and analysis of variance of speaker by question data. Methods for graphical displays of the results are also presented. The methods give convergent results that are mutually supportiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then the original matrices are compared to the sampling distribution to determine if a significant relationship exists between the matrices that is unlikely to have happened by chance (Borgatti et al, 2002) Authors' Pre-Proof Draft of paper for personal use. The QAP analysis in this study followed a two-step procedure recommended by Hruschka et al (2008) and Romney, Moore, Batchelder, and Hsia (2000). First a person-byperson (493x493) agreement matrix was calculated.…”
Section: Qap Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the original matrices are compared to the sampling distribution to determine if a significant relationship exists between the matrices that is unlikely to have happened by chance (Borgatti et al, 2002) Authors' Pre-Proof Draft of paper for personal use. The QAP analysis in this study followed a two-step procedure recommended by Hruschka et al (2008) and Romney, Moore, Batchelder, and Hsia (2000). First a person-byperson (493x493) agreement matrix was calculated.…”
Section: Qap Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to answer these remaining questions, we used the QAP Linear Regression Model to test the hypothesis that there are no systematic factors that contribute to the level of similarity between individuals. Hruschka et al (2008) and Paris (2012) applied the test originally described by Romney et al (2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We broke the study sample into two a-priori groups based on the nationalities of the respondents: Asia and Australasia. The QAP analysis in this study followed the procedure recommended by Hruschka, Sibley, Kalim, and Edmonds (2008), Romney, Moore, Batchelder, and Hsia (2000) and Paris (2012) which includes two steps. The first step was to prepare the data matrices, and the second step was to apply a QAP linear regression model to those matrices.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 210-by-77 data table was subjected to Principal Components Analysis (PCA). Here we follow [21] who applied PCA as the first stage of Cultural Consensus Analysis (CCA) [24]. Note that this is the 'Q mode' of PCA, in which subjects rather than items are the unit of analysis, so each component is a prototypical pattern of responses from an idealized subject.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%