2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.net.2017.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical model for forecasting uranium prices to estimate the nuclear fuel cycle cost

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…indicating that the residuals are random and that the model provides an adequate fit to the data [26,58]. The above set of residual diagnostics are tested on all other monitoring points and the same kind of results are achieved.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…indicating that the residuals are random and that the model provides an adequate fit to the data [26,58]. The above set of residual diagnostics are tested on all other monitoring points and the same kind of results are achieved.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, researchers have taken advantage of the use of spatial-temporal simulation models to study the effects of radioactive fallout and isotope distributions [23,24]. Moreover, the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model has already been used in the field of nuclear physics for forecasting the 226 Ra, 232 Th and 40 K concentrations in four regions of Istanbul [25], nuclear fuel cycle price estimation [26], and radon gas concentrations time-series estimation for earthquake prediction purposes [27,28]. It seems that, this model has not been used by scholars for estimating the Fukushima air dose rates.…”
Section: Jrncmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e SNF will be transported to a centralized dry storage, and, after the construction of a high-level repository, will be finally transported to that repository, as shown in Figures 3 and 4. OCDE 1994 [30] Charpin et al [29] Bunn 2003 [28] BCG 2006 [27] Ramana and Suchitra [26] De Roo and Parsons [25] Park et al [24] Ko and Gao [23] Recktenwald and Deinert [22] OCDE 2013 [21] Brinton and Kazimi [20] Zhou et al [19] Kim et al [18] Kim et al [17] Gao et al [16] Ganda et al [15] Zhang et al [14] Choi et al [13] Kim et al [12] Kim et al [11] Gao et al [10] Zhang et al [9] Yue et al [8] Chen et al [7] Krasnorutskyy and Kirsanova [6] International models Models applied classification (%)…”
Section: Site Status and Decommissioning Process Of Barakah Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The order of an ARIMA model is typically identified in the form of (p, d, q), where p indicates the order of the autoregressive part, d the amount of the difference and q the order of the moving average part (Jiang et al, 2018;Kim et al, 2017;Lasheras et al, 2015).…”
Section: Autoregressive Integrated Moving Averagementioning
confidence: 99%