1967
DOI: 10.1063/1.1709746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Model for the Size Effect in Electrical Conduction

Abstract: A statistical model for the reflection of scalar plane waves from a rough surface leads to a plane wave in the direction of specular reflection and to a contribution with a finite angular spread about that direction, depending on the tangential correlation of the surface asperities. Based upon on this result, a new semiclassical model, which satisfies the requirement of flux conservation, is proposed for the boundary condition for the distribution function of the size effect in the electrical conductivity. In … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
165
1
6

Year Published

1989
1989
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 446 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
165
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The variations in height translate into variations in the electron path lengths of those electrons reflected from the surface. Ziman 34 and Soffer 35 have shown that this is analogous to the surface diffraction problem.…”
Section: Scattering At the Outer Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The variations in height translate into variations in the electron path lengths of those electrons reflected from the surface. Ziman 34 and Soffer 35 have shown that this is analogous to the surface diffraction problem.…”
Section: Scattering At the Outer Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed in Ref. 35, in order to formulate surface diffraction for electron transport using an Ewald construction, the electron wave packet was assumed to be large enough so as to have a nearly monochromatic wavelength. From the STM pictures in Fig.…”
Section: Scattering At the Outer Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both sets of data, the same trend of increasing resistivity with decreasing layer thicknesses is observed. For extremely thin films the mean free path (L mfp ) of electrons becomes larger than the film thickness, resulting in increased scattering at the thin film interface and hence a higher resistivity [84,85]. The higher ρ-values for thin films for our measurements with respect to literature results can be due to differences in the metrology.…”
Section: Resistivitycontrasting
confidence: 42%
“…Equation (6) may be found from a solution of the Lippmann-Schwinger equation, for a wave packet elastically scattering of a rough interface as a boundary condition, in the far-field approximation employed here and then normalizing the average flux density to unity. 29 Further details maybe found in the following two references. 32 …”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%