“…Numerous reports describe model results on different air quality variables and different locations from multiple linear regression (MLR) analysis (Hubbard and Cobourn, 1998;Barrero et al, 2006;Stadlober et al, 2008), nonlinear multiple regressions (Cobourn, 2007), artificial neural networks (ANN) (Gardner and Dorling, 1998;Nunnari et al, 1998;Reich et al, 1999;Benvenuto and Marani, 2000;Perez et al, 2000;Perez, 2001;Kukkonen et al, 2003;Hooyberghs et al, 2005;Papanastasiou et al, 2007), generalized additive models and fuzzy-logic-based models (Cobourn et al, 2000). Other authors compared several methods on a single dataset (from the same measurement site) or combined various approaches in order to improve the specific air pollutant forecast (Agirre-Basurko et al, 2006;Goyal et al, 2006;AlAlawi et al, 2008). Comrie (1997) compared the potential of traditional regression and neural networks to forecast ozone pollution under different climate and ozone regimes.…”