2010
DOI: 10.1177/2150137810373613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Power, Sampling, and Effect Sizes

Abstract: This article discusses the interrelated issues of statistical power, sampling, and effect sizes when conducting rigorous quantitative research. Technical and practical connections are made between these concepts and various inferential tests. To increase power and generate effect sizes that merit practical or clinical notice, not only must the research aims and associated design be well devised, reflecting best scientific practice, state of the art sampling procedures should be applied with sufficiently large … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
73
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Values of r above 0.1,0.3, and 0.5 were interpreted as small, medium and large effect sizes, respectively (Sink and Mvududu, 2010). Finally, differences in scores of both the FCQ-T and FCQ-T-reduced between men and women and between restrained and unrestrained eaters were tested with t -tests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values of r above 0.1,0.3, and 0.5 were interpreted as small, medium and large effect sizes, respectively (Sink and Mvududu, 2010). Finally, differences in scores of both the FCQ-T and FCQ-T-reduced between men and women and between restrained and unrestrained eaters were tested with t -tests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El interés psicopedagógico del tema deriva de la incidencia de las estrategias de aprendizaje en el rendimiento académico (Camarero, Martín y Herrero, 2000;Cano y Justicia, 1993;Diset y Marthinsen, 2003;Gargallo et al, 2011;Gargallo, Suárez-Rodríguez y Pérez-Pérez, 2009;Pintrich, 1995;Pintrich y García, 1991;Pintrich, Smith, García y Mackeachie, 1991;Roces et al, 1999;Soares, Guisande, Almeida y Páramo, 2009;Valle y Rodríguez, 1998;Yip, 2007Yip, , 2009Yip, y 2012. Ello es así porque las estrategias de aprendizaje son uno de los constructos más potentes explicativos de los procesos de aprendizaje de los estudiantes.…”
unclassified
“…For knowledge of objectives and assessment criteria, the difference was statistically significant between the first and the second time point, and also between the first and the third time point, while the same evolutive pattern as at the other time points was maintained. In this group, effect size was also small in all cases: between 1.8% and 4.2% (Sink & Mvududu, 2010).…”
Section: Differences Between Excellent and Average Students In Their mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As regards effect sizes (from partial η2), we can state that the majority were small (Sink & Mvududu, 2010), although moderate values were achieved for extrinsic motivation and storage by mere repetition -which favored average students-, and for control/self-regulation, with a higher level accomplished by excellent students.…”
Section: Differences Between Excellent and Average Students In Their mentioning
confidence: 99%