2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2007.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical properties of post-sample hedging effectiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such findings are in line with Bystrom (2003), Copeland and Zhu (2006), Lien et al (2002) and Moosa (2003), where OLS was found to outperform the more complex and sophisticated models. Later, in Lien (2007), it is shown that, in large sample cases, the conventional hedge ratio provides the best performance, whereas for small sample cases a sufficiently large variation in the dynamic variance of the futures return is required in order for dynamic models to produce favourable variance reduction. It is also worth noting that the hedging effectiveness measure is based upon the unconditional variance.…”
Section: Rankmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such findings are in line with Bystrom (2003), Copeland and Zhu (2006), Lien et al (2002) and Moosa (2003), where OLS was found to outperform the more complex and sophisticated models. Later, in Lien (2007), it is shown that, in large sample cases, the conventional hedge ratio provides the best performance, whereas for small sample cases a sufficiently large variation in the dynamic variance of the futures return is required in order for dynamic models to produce favourable variance reduction. It is also worth noting that the hedging effectiveness measure is based upon the unconditional variance.…”
Section: Rankmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such findings are in line with Bystrom (2003), Copeland and Zhu (2006), Lien et al (2002) and Moosa (2003), where OLS was found to outperform the more complex and sophisticated models. Later in Lien (2007), it is shown that, in large sample cases, the conventional hedge ratio provides the best performance, whereas for small sample cases a sufficiently large variation in the dynamic variance of the futures return is required in order for dynamic models to produce favourable variance reduction. It is also worth noting that the hedging effectiveness measure is based upon the unconditional variance.…”
Section: Variance Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the effectiveness of this function, the hedging performance measure of Ederington (1979) is often applied. 1 This method computes the percentage reduction of 1 Within the family of stationary hedge strategy (where a constant hedge ratio is adopted over time), the OLS strategy has the best within-sample performance and most likely the best out-of-sample performance (Lien, 2005a(Lien, , 2005b(Lien, , 2007. In addition, Lien (2008aLien ( , 2009) suggests that dynamic hedge strategy tends to be outperformed by the OLS strategy as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%