PurposeThe study aims to identify differences in tibiofemoral joint morphology between responders (R group, no pain) to arthroscopic partial medial meniscectomy (APMM) versus medial postmeniscectomy syndrome patients (MPMS group, recurrent pain at 2 years postmeniscectomy) in a clinically neutrally aligned patient population. The second aim was to build a morphologyâbased predictive algorithm for response to treatment (RTT) in APMM.MethodsTwo patient groups were identified from a large multicentre database of meniscectomy patients at 2 years of followâup: the R group included 120 patients with a KOOS pain scoreâ>â75, and the MPMS group included 120 patients with a KOOS pain scoreââ€â75. Statistical shape models (SSMs) of distal femur, proximal tibia and tibiofemoral joint were used to compare knee morphology. Finally, a predictive model was developed to predict RTT, with the SSMâderived morphologic variables as predictors.ResultsNo differences were found between the R and MPMS groups for patient age, sex, height, weight or cartilage status. Knees in the MPMS group were significantly smaller, had a wider femoral notch and a smaller medial femoral condyle. A morphologyâbased predictive model was able to predict MPMS at 2 years followâup with a sensitivity of 74.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 74.4%â75.4%) and a specificity of 81.0% (95% CI: 80.6%â81.5%).ConclusionA smaller tibiofemoral joint, a wider intercondylar notch and smaller medial femoral condyle were observed shape variations related to medial postmeniscectomy syndrome. These promising results are a first step towards a knee morphologyâbased clinical decision support tool for meniscus treatment.Study DesignCaseâcontrol study.Level of EvidenceLevel IIIb.