2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3395872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Tests for Cross-Validation of Kriging Models

Abstract: We derive new statistical tests for leave-one-out cross-validation of Kriging models. Graphically, we present these tests as scatterplots augmented with con…dence intervals. We may wish to avoid extrapolation, which we de…ne as prediction of the output for a point that is a vertex of the convex hull of the given input combinations. Moreover, we may use bootstrapping to estimate the true variance of the Kriging predictor. The resulting tests (with or without extrapolation or bootstrapping) have type-I and type-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also provided an extensive review on model selection strategies, including model fitness and validation, as well as guidelines for the choice of surrogate model for modelling, feasibility analysis, and optimization purposes. For new statistical tests for leave-one-out cross-validation of Kriging models, the reader is referred to Kleijnen and van Beers [93].…”
Section: Selection Of Experimental Design and Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also provided an extensive review on model selection strategies, including model fitness and validation, as well as guidelines for the choice of surrogate model for modelling, feasibility analysis, and optimization purposes. For new statistical tests for leave-one-out cross-validation of Kriging models, the reader is referred to Kleijnen and van Beers [93].…”
Section: Selection Of Experimental Design and Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The special case K=n$K = n$ is referred to as leave‐one‐out (LOO) cross‐validation. In practice, other leave‐one‐out strategies can be developed and applied 25 …”
Section: Validation Criteria For Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, other leave-one-out strategies can be developed and applied. 25 All the quantitative and graphical indicators of validation presented in the following can be applied indifferently on a test sample or by cross-validation. They will be formulated here by LOO cross-validation, considering the notations ẑ−𝑖 and ŝ2…”
Section: Estimation Procedures For Validation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Ds=ysyfalsês1ls=1l()ysyfalsês20.25em()s=1,2,,l where y s and yfalsês are the prediction for s th sample point using original Kriging surrogate and surrogate constructed with removing s th sample, respectively. Note that the surrogate is accepted when most of the standardized residuals are located in the acceptable range of [−3, 3], see References 56,70. Details of the statistical procedure required for leave‐one‐out cross‐validation are provided in Reference 70.…”
Section: Surrogate‐based Robust Simulation‐optimization (Two‐layer Sumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the surrogate is accepted when most of the standardized residuals are located in the acceptable range of [−3, 3], see References 56,70. Details of the statistical procedure required for leave‐one‐out cross‐validation are provided in Reference 70.…”
Section: Surrogate‐based Robust Simulation‐optimization (Two‐layer Sumentioning
confidence: 99%