1995
DOI: 10.1002/9783527615452.ch5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Validation of QSAR Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
278
0
7

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 339 publications
(287 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
278
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, VIP values greater than 1 considered influential factors in PLS regression models (Wold, 2008;Azizan et al, 2012). In this study, the authors determined the driving sensory attributes as VIP values of 1 or above in t1 and t2 (Table 5) as well as the position in the correlation map (Figure 3).…”
Section: Driving Sensory Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, VIP values greater than 1 considered influential factors in PLS regression models (Wold, 2008;Azizan et al, 2012). In this study, the authors determined the driving sensory attributes as VIP values of 1 or above in t1 and t2 (Table 5) as well as the position in the correlation map (Figure 3).…”
Section: Driving Sensory Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process was carried out 10 times on 10 unique independent subsets. 23 Finally, the calculation of percentages of global good classification (accuracy), sensibility, specificity (also known as ''hit rate''), false positive rate (also known as ''false alarm rate''), and Matthews correlation coefficient (C) in the training and test (predicting) sets permitted the assessment of the model. 24 …”
Section: Data Analysis and Processing: Linear Discriminant Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 The cross-validated correlation coefficient (r 2 cv >0.5) values obtained for the best QSAR models indicated their reliability in predicting the antimicrobial activity of different substituted anilides. In case of B.subtilis the r 2 cv value is less than 0.5 which appears that the developed model is an invalid one.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%