Status and Contemporary Development of Employee Inventions Ownership in G-20 Countries

Roisah, ‪Kholis; Utama, Y. J.; Saraswati, Retno; Whidari, Y.

doi:10.35808/ersj/996

Cited by 9 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This can be interpreted as the commitment of the state through the Act, as in Article 3 regarding the objectives, namely to create a conducive business climate through a fair business competition arrangement so as to ensure the certainty of equal business opportunities for large business actors, medium business actors and small business actors. With this exception, the law respects the conditions and efforts of the sustainable small businesses and cooperatives that dominate our national business actors (Roisah et al, 2018;Pangestu et al, 2002).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition in Indonesia: A Legal Mechanism to Balance the Public Interest

Mahendrawati

2021

Int. J. Criminol. Sociol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study is to explore the legal mechanism of prohibition of monopolistic practices and unfair business competition in Indonesia by looking at the role of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU). This study was conducted using the empirical normative method. In this context, the regulatory reference used is Law No. 5 of 1999 (Anti-Monopoly Law). Other regulations are Article 34 of Law No. 5 of 1999 and Presidential Decree No. 75 of 1999 and named the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU). Several KPPU decisions analyzed were in the cities of Medan, Semarang, Surabaya, Makassar and Central Jakarta. The results showed that Law No. 5 of 1999 regarding the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition in Indonesia was formulated to the principle of balancing interests, namely the balance between the interests of business actors with the public interest. The formulation of the principle of balance can be found in the considerations, explanations and articles in Law No. 5 of 1999.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition in Indonesia: A Legal Mechanism to Balance the Public Interest

Mahendrawati

2021

Int. J. Criminol. Sociol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The findings also showed that in comparison, in general, in settling tax disputes through the judiciary, there are appeal and cassation efforts in some countries, for example, the United States, the Netherlands, Canada, South Korea, Japan, Malaysia (Pratt & Kulsrud, 2011;Ispriyarso & Saadah, 2019;Roisah et al, 2020). Settlement of tax disputes through judicial institutions in various countries such as the United States (Lederman, 2014), Canada (Arnold, 2019), South Korea (Yun, 2003), Japan (Nakayama, 2007), and Malaysia (Kasipillai, 2000) shows that there are efforts to appeal and cassation.…”

Section: Reform Of Legislative Aspectmentioning

confidence: 94%

Legal Reformation of Tax Court in Indonesia: Reforming Legal Culture, Institutional and Legislative Aspects

Ispriyarso

Bayuseno

Wahab

2021

Int. J. Criminol. Sociol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research is motivated by the many weaknesses that exist in the Ppajak court in Indonesia. Therefore, this research needs to be carried out with the aim that the tax court in the future will be better, more certain in law, and just. The problem is the reason for reforming the tax court in Indonesia and the way to reform the law on the tax court in Indonesia. The research method used is a statutory, historical, and comparative approach. The result of his research is that the tax court in Indonesia must be reformed because it contains many weaknesses. Furthermore, the findings show that tax court reform must be carried out from the aspects of legislation, institutional and legal culture. Based on the statutory aspect, synchronization of laws must be carried out. Based on the institutional aspect, institutional improvement must be carried out. Based on the aspect of legal culture, this must be done by increasing the morale of the parties. The novelty of this research is that the tax dispute settlement model is found after the tax court becomes a special court within the state administrative court. In conclusion, the tax court in Indonesia still contains many weaknesses, so it must be reformed immediately.

show abstract

“…30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and ADR are often used by parties in dispute resolution in general, but for the resolution of endowment disputes it still needs to be tested, whether the law can be used as a guideline or not, given the act of endowment has characteristics. 16 The characteristics of endowment acts are the responsibility of endowment property is intended for the community and endowment property must not be lost, damaged, but preserved for the benefit of eternity. If there is a change in objectives and benefits, it must be licensed by PPAIW and BWI as an institution responsible for endowment acts in Indonesia.…”

Section: Resolution Of Endowment Disputesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dispute Resolution through Mediation in Endowments Cases in the Legal Effectiveness Theoretical Perspective

2021

MLU

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The development of endowment land in Indonesia is very rapid which is directly proportional to the problems that occur regarding endowment. The resolution of this endowment dispute is based on the charity law, carried out by deliberation and mediation. In some cases, the mediation conducted was not following the existing mediation rules so that eventually the resolution of the endowment dispute became ineffective.It is important to study the problem of the resolution of endowment disputes through mediation from the perspective of the theory of legal effectiveness. This study aims to understand and analyze the problematic of endowment dispute resolution through mediation from the perspective of the theory of legal effectiveness in Central Java. The research method used is socio-legal research, with an empirical juridical approach and includes qualitative research. The results of this study are the settlement of endowment disputes through mediation outside the court according to the theory of legal effectiveness, not yet effective, because there are no formal legal rules. It is necessary to make regulations for the implementation of non-litigation mediation, to provide practical guidance for the implementation of mediation in the community.

show abstract

Status and Contemporary Development of Employee Inventions Ownership in G-20 Countries

Cited by 9 publications

References 4 publications

Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition in Indonesia: A Legal Mechanism to Balance the Public Interest

Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition in Indonesia: A Legal Mechanism to Balance the Public Interest

Legal Reformation of Tax Court in Indonesia: Reforming Legal Culture, Institutional and Legislative Aspects

Dispute Resolution through Mediation in Endowments Cases in the Legal Effectiveness Theoretical Perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About