2017 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/ieem.2017.8290242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status and future of manufacturing execution systems

Abstract: This paper proposes a taxonomy for characterizing manufacturing execution systems and discusses how they can benefit from the recent developments of Industry 4.0. The study is based on a literature review. The taxonomy contributes to theory and practice by providing a framework for benchmarking of manufacturing execution systems. The taxonomy can be utilized in the selection or design process of the manufacturing execution systems. Outlining the further opportunities provided by Industry 4.0 technologies, the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the six layers on the vertical axis, the components of Industry 4.0 are described structurally [21]. As the center for collecting, processing, and delivering the information both in the horizontal and vertical direction, the MES is indispensable in the developing manufacturing industries [22].…”
Section: Definition and Functionality Of The Mesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the six layers on the vertical axis, the components of Industry 4.0 are described structurally [21]. As the center for collecting, processing, and delivering the information both in the horizontal and vertical direction, the MES is indispensable in the developing manufacturing industries [22].…”
Section: Definition and Functionality Of The Mesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, in the current manufacturing industry, the application of Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) and Enterprise Resources Planning (ERP) are still very disseminated solutions to take into account visualization, planning and control tasks in several industrial scenarios [47,48]. MES provides many functionalities to the current industry in relation to execute monitoring, resources allocation, tasks scheduling, data collection/acquisition, management, maintenance, tracking, performance analysis and control operations on the shop floor, with real-time access to key performance indices to facilitate the decision-making and reconfiguration actions [49]. By the other hand, ERP manages and track all the information and operational service in a company, covering functional areas such as: human resources, logistics, finance and production [50].…”
Section: B Industrial Cyber-physical Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reduced number of research papers focused on vertical integration of enterprise layers are available in academic environment (Arica and Powell 2018). An early specification for the MES dates back to the 90's in the works of (Barkmeyer et al 1999;Deuel 1994).…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scarcity of MES literature is also highlighted by (Arica and Powell 2018) which identifies only one literature review since 2009 done by (De Ugarte, Artiba, and Pellerin 2009) which is focused on technological developments and disadvantages of MES. A second literature review in the field is done by (Arica and Powell 2018) with the goal of supporting the MES selection process. The approach proposes a taxonomy to characterizes MES in two categories of factors: business and manufacturing and technological.…”
Section: General Facts Definition and Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation