Status gramatyczny predykatywnych SZKODA , WSTYD , ŻAL raz jeszcze

Przepiórkowski, Adam

doi:10.17651/polon.39.5

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This issue was the subject of a long-term debate, as a result of which various features were pointed out that could be considered as determinants of "predicativeness" (cf. Wróbel 1988;Wiśniewski 1989;Szupryczyńska 1995;Przepiórkowski 2019).…”

Section: Gaining Predicative Features By the Forms Można/ Niemożna An...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Verbification of Feminine Forms of Adjectives Można ‘Posible ’, Niemożna ‘Imposible ’ and Niepodobna ‘Imposible ’ – Corpus -Based Aproach

Bronikowska

2023

Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný Casopis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article is devoted to the process taking place in the Middle Polish period, which led to the transformation of nominative, singular, feminine forms of three adjectives (można ‘possible’, niemożna ‘impossible’ and niepodobna ‘impossible’) into verbal lexemes (the so-called predicatives). In this respect, the predicative uses of these forms in the texts collected in the Electronic Corpus of 17th- and 18th-century Polish Texts (up to 1772) were investigated. The progressive verbification of adjectival forms was considered to be indicated by three changes in the constructions where these forms played the role of a predicate: supersession of connections with feminine verb forms by connections with neuter forms, limiting the connections with verbs to the auxiliary verb być ‘to be’, and disappearance of connections with the personal form of the verb być in the present tense. The research results show that both forms acquired the two most important features characteristic for predicatives during the 17th century. The third of the analysed properties characterizes the form można/niemożna from the second half of the 19th century, and the process of its acquisition by the form niepodobna has not ended yet.

show abstract

Section: Gaining Predicative Features By the Forms Można/ Niemożna An...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Verbification of Feminine Forms of Adjectives Można ‘Posible ’, Niemożna ‘Imposible ’ and Niepodobna ‘Imposible ’ – Corpus -Based Aproach

Bronikowska

2023

Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný Casopis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Przyjmujemy, że łączliwość ta zależy od typu grupy (liczebnikowa lub nominalna), a nie od liczby gramatycznej (mnoga lub pojedyncza) (zob. Przepiórkowski 2006). Również osobno badaliśmy akceptowalność operatora po z obydwoma rodzajami grup.…”

Section: Pounclassified

O dystrybucji synonimicznych przyimków i operatorów adnumeratywnych

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article presents the results of questionnaire studies on the nominal – ad-verbal and post-prepositional – distribution of Polish prepositions and adnumeral operators of the form około ‘ a b o u t ’, od... do... ‘from... to...’, po ‘each’, and między ‘between’. These results demonstrate that adnominal operators około, od... do... and między are acceptable to various degrees, from the highly acceptable około, to the at best marginally accept-able między. They also confirm the existence of the distributive operator po, albeit limited to the positions of the subject and, perhaps, accusative object. Also the prepositions około, od... do..., and po are acceptable to various degrees and only in ad-verbal nominative, accusative and genitive positions.

show abstract

“…(22) zacząć: subj,controller{E} + controllee{infp(imperf)} Wcześniejsze słowniki walencyjne albo w ogóle nie zdawały sprawy z faktu, że takie czasowniki mogą łączyć się z podmiotami innymi niż nominalne mianownikowe, albo -jak w wypadku elektronicznego słownika Marka Świdzińskiego (1998) -podawały dwa różne hasła dla takich czasowników, z wymaganiem podmiotu i bez wymagania podmiotu, co i tak nie pozwalało na odpowiednie opisanie podmiotów nienominalnych w tych wypadkach, w których realizacje takie dopuszczał podrzędny bezokolicznik (Świdziński 1993;Przepiórkowski 1997).…”

Section: Warstwa Składniowaunclassified