Reactor Dosimetry 1985
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-5378-9_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status of Regulatory Issues and Research in Light Water Reactor Surveillance Dosimetry in the U.S.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in the 1980s in the US, Regulatory concerns arose, with the emergence of pressurised thermal shock issue, over the requirement for improved methodologies for more precise fluence and flux determinations. This led the USNRC to establish a co-operative programme that included validation of experimental and analytical methods of fluence determination in LWR surveillance programmes [32]. ASTM in the USA took the lead in developing standards relating to LWR surveillance, including the development of dosimetry standards [33].…”
Section: Characterising the Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the 1980s in the US, Regulatory concerns arose, with the emergence of pressurised thermal shock issue, over the requirement for improved methodologies for more precise fluence and flux determinations. This led the USNRC to establish a co-operative programme that included validation of experimental and analytical methods of fluence determination in LWR surveillance programmes [32]. ASTM in the USA took the lead in developing standards relating to LWR surveillance, including the development of dosimetry standards [33].…”
Section: Characterising the Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%