2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2012.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status of the EU domestic agency electromagnetic analyses of ITER vacuum vessel and blanket modules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Being the first barrier to accept the outburst of the electromagnetic energy, the wall reaction (tremendous induced currents) strongly affects the process and should be properly treated. This is confirmed by observations of strong disruption forces on the wall observed on JET tokamak [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] and in various theoretical studies that predict the existence of such forces [4,5,7,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] and end up in formidable extrapolations to ITER…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Being the first barrier to accept the outburst of the electromagnetic energy, the wall reaction (tremendous induced currents) strongly affects the process and should be properly treated. This is confirmed by observations of strong disruption forces on the wall observed on JET tokamak [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] and in various theoretical studies that predict the existence of such forces [4,5,7,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] and end up in formidable extrapolations to ITER…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…If instead a simplified description of the plasma would be used without guaranteed force balance on the plasma, this might not be true anymore. The example that deserves careful study under this angle is the plasma described as a set of current-carrying filaments (either toroidally directed [27,45] or tilted and shifted [5,11]). If their choice is not subject to the constraint that the total force acting on the full set of such filaments is zero, the force calculated on the perfect wall would be wrong of the same amount.…”
Section: Disruption Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This condition and its consequence F(w−) = 0, where F is the same integral as in (1), but taken on w−, are automatically satisfied when B is found in solving the full equilibrium problem with proper matching of the internal and external solutions. On the contrary, when the plasma is introduced as a rigid ring [3,4,8] or wire [36][37][38] or a set of filaments [21,22,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] with a current J, the tilt and CQ treated as dJ/dt = 0 result in a magnetic field different from B needed for the gaseous (absolutely non-rigid!) plasma equilibrium.…”
Section: Models For the Sideways Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes it is not clear whether this current is properly accounted for [50,51], and very often it is plainly ignored [19,[24][25][26][27][28] in the disruption tasks. The latter occurs in calculations when the wall is replaced by a set of isolated toroidal conductors, as described in the applications of the DINA code [19,25,28].…”
Section: The Disruption Force and Its Partial Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%