2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2007.07.123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status of triple GEM muon chambers for the LHCb experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown below, the detector continuously operating with 55 Fe X-ray source at the highest gas gain, 32000, withstands 0.5 millions discharges without damage to materials and functionality. As known from the experience described in [16], the gas gain of ~5000 is sufficient for detection of charged particles in the case of 3 mm thick gas gap with Ar/CO2/CF4 (45/15/45) gas mixture and readout pads of 2.5 cm 2 so that there is almost no charge sharing.…”
Section: Jinst 15 C09041mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As shown below, the detector continuously operating with 55 Fe X-ray source at the highest gas gain, 32000, withstands 0.5 millions discharges without damage to materials and functionality. As known from the experience described in [16], the gas gain of ~5000 is sufficient for detection of charged particles in the case of 3 mm thick gas gap with Ar/CO2/CF4 (45/15/45) gas mixture and readout pads of 2.5 cm 2 so that there is almost no charge sharing.…”
Section: Jinst 15 C09041mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Natural differences in detector construction and slightly different operating conditions give rise to different time responses. A major difference to be considered is the one between the triple GEM (placed in M1R1) and the MWPC responses, which has been measured to be 35 ns in average [13].…”
Section: Pre-alignment Conditions and Alignment Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%