Abstract.-Populations of the Near-Threatened giant bullfrog (Pyxicephalus adspersus)have been poorly monitored due to the unpredictable appearance of this species aboveground. To better understand the activity of P. adspersus we quantified spawning by a population during five summers, and the activity of twenty adult frogs radio-tracked at the same site ca. twice weekly during the first three summers. In addition we examined animal activity, and population spawning in relation to meteorological variables, day of season, and moon light. During the six-month summer period, males and females, respectively, spent 10 ± 7 and 3 ± 2 days at water, and 22 ± 5 and 13 ± 5 nights active. Greater proportions of radio-tracked animals moved overland, and/or foraged at night, around full moon, after heavy rainfall, when cooler, and less windy conditions prevailed. More animals were found at water, or on land during the day, and population spawning was more likely, earlier in summer, following heavier rainfall. Spawning occurred most frequently, in descending order, during December, January, and November, and was triggered by 40 ± 16 mm rain in 24 h. Spawning events lasted 2 ± 1 days, but were prolonged around full moon.Numbers of males at spawning events varied between 30 and 500 males, and were positively correlated with the previous day's rainfall. Annually 6 ± 1 spawning events occurred, and numbers of annual spawning events were positively correlated with total summer rainfall. Results of this study show that single counts of spawning adults will often result in gross underestimates of population size, and therefore, long-term adult counts are necessary to detect real population trends. Due to the unpredictable activity of adults, however, it may be more practical to monitor, within certain areas, the number of aquatic sites where breeding occurs, for improved conservation management of P. adspersus.
3Although photoperiod and the lunar cycle provide predictable cues that amphibians may use to synchronize their behaviour (Fitzgerald & Bider 1974;Both et al. 2008;Canavero & Arim 2009;Grant et al. 2009), the activity of many species is ultimately dictated by unpredictable climatic variables because of their permeable skin and ectothermic bodies (Duellman & Trueb 1994). Among these, precipitation tends to exert the greatest influence (Bulger et al. 2003;Lemckert & Brassil 2003), but temperature (Howard 1978;Van Gelder et al. 1986), humidity (Bellis 1965;Bartelt et al. 2004), wind (Penman et al. 2006Philips et al. 2007), light intensity/cloud cover (Jameson 1955;Blankenhorn 1972), and barometric pressure (Blankenhorn 1972) can also significantly affect amphibian activity. Amphibians in dry and/or cold environments are most limited by suitable warm, wet conditions, making it difficult to predict their behaviour or even their presence (e.g., Bulger et al. 2003;Bartelt et al. 2004;Goldberg & Schwalbe 2004). This can represent a serious challenge for effective conservation management of threatened amphibian taxa (e.g., Penman et al...