1986
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(86)90003-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steady laminar forced convection from a circular cylinder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current work utilizes an inviscid "characteristic" formulation for the upper inflow/outflow boundary; an improvement to this boundary condition which would overcome the limitation of using a finite computational domain has been suggested by Jafroudi and Yang [56]. They recommended obtaining the asymptotic solution for the compressible, turbulent Navier-Stokes equations at large distances from the finite body.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current work utilizes an inviscid "characteristic" formulation for the upper inflow/outflow boundary; an improvement to this boundary condition which would overcome the limitation of using a finite computational domain has been suggested by Jafroudi and Yang [56]. They recommended obtaining the asymptotic solution for the compressible, turbulent Navier-Stokes equations at large distances from the finite body.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the , the percent errors estimated from the literature results (Tritton 1959; Takami & Keller 1969; Dennis & Chang 1970) range from 0 to 3.1 %, 1 % to 4.2 %, 1.1 % to 2.2 % and 0.6 % to 5 % for and , respectively. For the , the percent errors computed from the previous results (Dennis, Hudson & Smith 1968; Jafroudi & Yang 1986; Bharti, Chhabra & Eswaran 2007; Biswas & Sarkar 2009) differ from 1 % to 3.1 %, 0.4 % to 4.6 %, 0 to 1.4 % and 0 to 6.6 % for and , respectively. Therefore, the current numerical scheme is considered valid and the grid resolution around each circular cylinder is sufficiently fine for the rest of the computations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The average convective heat transfer coefficients (h q ) are computed as h ave ¼ 2.76, 3.38 and 4.43 W/m 2 K for the blockage ratio cases of b ¼ 0.333, 0.571 and 0.800, where the corresponding average Nusselt numbers are Nu ave ¼ 4.05, 4.97 and 6.51. Biswas and Sarkar [37], Dennis et al [43], Jafroudi and Yang [44] and Apelt and Ledwich [45] considered flows around circular cylinders without blockage for the specific case of Re ¼ 40 and evaluated average Nusselt numbers in the narrow band of Nu ave ¼ 3.20e3.48. On the other hand, Bharti et al [12], Buyruk et al [15], Khan et al [16] and Dhiman et al [17] also reported raised heat transfer values with blockage.…”
Section: Computational Analysis In the Air Flow Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%