50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 2012
DOI: 10.2514/6.2012-1140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steady-State Closed-Loop Control of Bypass Boundary Layer Transition Using Plasma Actuators

Abstract: The overarching objective motivating this work is a physical demonstration of modelbased, closed-loop control of bypass transition using plasma actuators. The present work is concerned with the closed-loop control of bypass transition using plasma actuators. This manuscripts extends the work by Hanson et al., 1, 2 who demonstrated that a spanwise array of plasma actuators can produce significant attenuation of the transient growth disturbances introduced by roughness elements. In the present work, the control … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plasma actuator SDBD plasma actuators (hereafter simply referred to as plasma actuators), provide a uniquely deployable, robust and adjustable amplitude flow forcing that is appropriate for the target control experiments (Hanson et al 2010(Hanson et al , 2012(Hanson et al , 2014Osmokrovic et al 2015). A comprehensive description of this type of a plasma actuator arrangement may be found in Corke, Post & Orlov (2009) or Benard & Moreau (2014).…”
Section: Roughness Elementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasma actuator SDBD plasma actuators (hereafter simply referred to as plasma actuators), provide a uniquely deployable, robust and adjustable amplitude flow forcing that is appropriate for the target control experiments (Hanson et al 2010(Hanson et al , 2012(Hanson et al , 2014Osmokrovic et al 2015). A comprehensive description of this type of a plasma actuator arrangement may be found in Corke, Post & Orlov (2009) or Benard & Moreau (2014).…”
Section: Roughness Elementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plasma excitation's correction effect on the mean flow can be used to suppress the growth of the local 3D cross-flow component in the boundary layer of the swept-back wing model, thereby delaying the transition [7]. Based on the feedback from the wall shear stress test, adjusting the plasma actuator layout to generate the flow vortex structure suppresses the flow stripes in the bypass transition at the IOP Publishing doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2730/1/012055 2 incoming flow velocity of 5 m/s, thus delaying the transition [8][9]. To delay the transverse turning of a conical boundary layer at an incoming flow of 3.5 Ma [10], a plasma actuator is used to generate pairs of counter-rotating vortices that suppress high-harmonic energies and thus delay the transition in a supersonic boundary layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the other strategies, direct damping of the cross-flow vortices in the boundary layer was theoretically studied in [6]. Plasma actuators, designed as plasma vortex generators (VG), were also used to damp the streaks in the problem of algebraic instability control [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%