2011
DOI: 10.5459/bnzsee.44.4.297-318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steel structures damage from the Christchurch earthquake series of 2010 and 2011

Abstract: This paper presents preliminary field observations on the performance of selected steel structures in Christchurch during the earthquake series of 2010 to 2011. This comprises 6 damaging earthquakes, on 4 September and 26 December 2010, February 22, June 6 and two on June 13, 2011. Most notable of these was the 4 September event, at Ms7.1 and MM7 (MM as observed in the Christchurch CBD) and most intense was the 22 February event at Ms6.3 and MM9-10 within the CBD. Focus is on performance of concentrically brac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
24
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…• Field observations from past earthquakes (eg, 63,64 ) along with numerical studies 65 suggest that the inelastic behavior of columns in structures as well as bridge piers could be considerably affected by soil-structure-interaction, which was neglected in the present study. • The paper findings suggest that recently proposed structural solutions 66,67 may be further exploited to potentially minimize steel MRF column structural damage due to local buckling.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Present Study And Future Workmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• Field observations from past earthquakes (eg, 63,64 ) along with numerical studies 65 suggest that the inelastic behavior of columns in structures as well as bridge piers could be considerably affected by soil-structure-interaction, which was neglected in the present study. • The paper findings suggest that recently proposed structural solutions 66,67 may be further exploited to potentially minimize steel MRF column structural damage due to local buckling.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Present Study And Future Workmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The inherent flexibility of exposed or embedded column base connections may significantly influence the column residual axial‐shortening Field observations from past earthquakes (eg,) along with numerical studies suggest that the inelastic behavior of columns in structures as well as bridge piers could be considerably affected by soil‐structure‐interaction, which was neglected in the present study. The paper findings suggest that recently proposed structural solutions may be further exploited to potentially minimize steel MRF column structural damage due to local buckling. These have a high potential to reduce the likelihood of building demolition due to column residual axial‐shortening. Exploiting the benefits of controlled soil plastification in prospective seismic designs may be an alternative to minimize column residual axial‐shortening in steel MRFs.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Present Study And Future Workmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Repair and retrofit of EBF systems gained importance after the 2010 and 2011 New Zealand earthquakes where fractured links were replaced with new ones . The links which were damaged during the New Zealand earthquakes were not originally designed as replaceable links.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Repair and retrofit of EBF systems gained importance after the 2010 and 2011 New Zealand earthquakes where fractured links were replaced with new ones. [3][4][5] The links which were damaged during the New Zealand earthquakes were not originally designed as replaceable links. The existing links were removed by cutting out the braces and the collector beams and fabricating new link segments with braces based on a template obtained after link removal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenges of post disaster damage assessment have been highlighted in Christchurch, New Zealand. The absence of accepted, detailed and accurate assessment methods led to significant debate about the level of damage and remaining fatigue life of a number of structures (Clifton et al., ; Garevski, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%