2020
DOI: 10.38124/ijisrt20jul240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steel Surface Defect Detection using Deep Learning

Abstract: Steel defects are a frequent problem in steel companies. Proper quality control can reduce quality problems arising from steel defects. Nowadays, steel defects can detect by automation methods that utilize certain algorithms. Deep learning can help the steel defect detection algorithm become more sophisticated. In this study, we use deep learning CNN with Xception architecture to detect steel defects from images taken from high-frequency and high-resolution cameras. There are two techniques used, and both prod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the classification algorithm, we compare ResNet and ResNet _ vd, ResNet_ vd_ dcnv2, ResNet_ vd_ dcnv2_ ImprovedCutout, Fadli et al [43], and konovalenko et al [44]. We can find that the improved method has better performance, and the highest accuracy can reach 0.9752.…”
Section: The Results Of the Classification Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For the classification algorithm, we compare ResNet and ResNet _ vd, ResNet_ vd_ dcnv2, ResNet_ vd_ dcnv2_ ImprovedCutout, Fadli et al [43], and konovalenko et al [44]. We can find that the improved method has better performance, and the highest accuracy can reach 0.9752.…”
Section: The Results Of the Classification Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Litvintseva et al [133] compared E-Net, DeepLabV3, and U-Net models for metal surface defect recognition, with DeepLabV3 achieving the highest accuracy. Fadli et al [134] employed VGG-16 and VGG-19 models for image recognition of steel surface defects, achieving performance values of 97.20% and 93.30%, respectively. Gao et al [135] proposed a lightweight inspection network for multi-class steel plate surface defect detection.…”
Section: Supervisedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The InceptionV3-LR pipeline performed the best on both training and test data compared to the other methods investigated. Another study addressed common steel surface defects like scratches, pitting, inclusions, and patches to separate defective from non-defective surfaces [11]. The authors used a CNN with Xception architecture to detect these defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%