2019 25th International Conference on Automation and Computing (ICAC) 2019
DOI: 10.23919/iconac.2019.8895110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steel Surface Defect Detection Using GAN and One-Class Classifier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Commonly used image reconstruction loss functions including L2 loss [43], mean squared error [44], SSIM [45], etc., belong to the methods that directly compare the images before and after reconstruction. It is also possible to perform defect detection based on differences between the distributions of features of defect-free and defect samples using methods such as GAN models proposed by Schlegl et al-AnoGAN [18] and f-AnoGAN [19], support vector machine classifiers proposed by Liu et al [46] for defect classification, and Ganomaly [20] proposed by Akçay et al…”
Section: Model Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly used image reconstruction loss functions including L2 loss [43], mean squared error [44], SSIM [45], etc., belong to the methods that directly compare the images before and after reconstruction. It is also possible to perform defect detection based on differences between the distributions of features of defect-free and defect samples using methods such as GAN models proposed by Schlegl et al-AnoGAN [18] and f-AnoGAN [19], support vector machine classifiers proposed by Liu et al [46] for defect classification, and Ganomaly [20] proposed by Akçay et al…”
Section: Model Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These defects reveal themselves as irregularities on metal or wood surfaces, electronic parts, and so on. For example, an application of visual surface defect detection is studied in four primary studies [33,44,124,69] and industrial quality inspection is investigated in three studies [40,77,99].…”
Section: Rq2: What Are the Application Domains Of Anomaly Detection W...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that 27 out of 128 primary studies evaluated the quality of the generated samples using 9 different performance evaluation metrics. Most studies evaluated data quality quantitatively, while six papers implemented visual inspection to evaluate the quality of the generated samples [17,40,60,69,139,135]. During the inspections, the generated samples were examined by application domain experts, or simply the authors of the individual studies.…”
Section: Rq4: Which Type Of Data Instance and Datasets Are Most Commo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if images are augmented at various angles for various types of fabrics, the learning time increases proportionally. In addition, this study assumes that learning for fabric vision inspection is processed only with normal data in actual environments as described in [4,5] where it is difficult to obtain abnormal samples for each new-patterned fabric. For this reason, there is a possibility that it is judged as a defect but not a defect because it learns the various unit shapes generated by the sliding window during augmentation as normal even though there is an error with a different pattern area as shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%