2006
DOI: 10.1086/506193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stellar Remnants in Galactic Nuclei: Mass Segregation

Abstract: The study of how stars distribute themselves around a massive black hole (MBH) in the center of a galaxy is an important prerequisite for the understanding of many galactic-center processes. These include the observed overabundance of point X-ray sources at the Galactic center, the prediction of rates and characteristics of tidal disruptions of extended stars by the MBH and of inspirals of compact stars into the MBH, the latter being events of high importance for the future space borne gravitational wave inter… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

26
363
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(389 citation statements)
references
References 168 publications
(262 reference statements)
26
363
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hopman & Alexander (2006b) used Fokker-planck calculations to show that γ should be 1.4 for solar mass MS stars and up to 2 for stellar black holes (SBH). Similar results from MonteCarlo calculations were found by Freitag et al (2006) However, observations of red-giants in the Galactic center suggest a core-like structure in the inner regions of the GC (γ in the range 0 − 0.5; Do et al 2009;Bartko et al 2010;Genzel et al 2010. Nevertheless, it is not yet clear whether the distribution of red-giants reflect the overall distribution of stars in the GC, and various models had been suggested to explain both a "real" core distribution (Merritt 2010) or an apparent one (i.e., only reflecting the distribution of red-giants; Dale et al 2009;Amaro-Seoane & Chen 2014;Aharon & Perets 2015).…”
Section: Cusp and Core Models For The Nuclear Clustersupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Hopman & Alexander (2006b) used Fokker-planck calculations to show that γ should be 1.4 for solar mass MS stars and up to 2 for stellar black holes (SBH). Similar results from MonteCarlo calculations were found by Freitag et al (2006) However, observations of red-giants in the Galactic center suggest a core-like structure in the inner regions of the GC (γ in the range 0 − 0.5; Do et al 2009;Bartko et al 2010;Genzel et al 2010. Nevertheless, it is not yet clear whether the distribution of red-giants reflect the overall distribution of stars in the GC, and various models had been suggested to explain both a "real" core distribution (Merritt 2010) or an apparent one (i.e., only reflecting the distribution of red-giants; Dale et al 2009;Amaro-Seoane & Chen 2014;Aharon & Perets 2015).…”
Section: Cusp and Core Models For The Nuclear Clustersupporting
confidence: 76%
“…S0-38 does improve the limit compared to S0-2 alone, but the main reason for the lower limit compared to earlier work is due to increased time coverage of the orbit of S0-2. Our new limit is still over an order of magnitude more than the ∼500-1000 M e of stellar remnants predicted to be within 0.01 pc (e.g., Freitag et al 2006), and other models predict even less mass within 0.01 pc (Merritt 2010). As observations of the orbits of S0-2 and S0-38 continue, the limits on the extended dark mass within 0.01 pc will continue to decrease.…”
Section: Scientific Implications Of New Constraints On M Bh and R Omentioning
confidence: 54%
“…In addition to the central SMBH, a central cluster of stellar-mass BHs and/or other compact objects has been predicted and theoretically explored (e.g., Morris 1993;Miralda-Escudé & Gould 2000;Freitag et al 2006;Merritt 2010). The amount of extended dark mass within the orbits of S0-2 and S0-38 influences their orbital motion.…”
Section: Values Derived From the Simultaneous Orbital Fit Of S0-38 Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to the shallow density distribution of 1.5 (Bahcall & Wolf 1977). Later numerical simulations and analytical models confirmed these results (Freitag et al 2006;Preto & AmaroSeoane 2010;Hopman & Alexander 2006b). These steep density distributions were expected for the central cluster considering its age, which is comparable to the estimates of the two-body relaxation-time of 1−20 Gyr for the central parsec (Alexander 2005;Merritt 2010;Kocsis & Tremaine 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Their volume density will be significantly reduced and they may even be expelled from the very center. Freitag et al (2006) show that the main-sequence stars begin to be expelled outward by the cusp of stellar-mass black holes (SBH) after a few Gyrs, just shorter than the presumed age of the stellar cluster at about 10 Gyr. While the reservoir of lower mass stars may be replenished by the most recent -possibly still ongoing -star formation episode about 6 million years ago (Paumard et al 2006), we assume that stars well below our low mass limit of ∼0.34 M with K s -band brightnesses around K s = 25 are affected by depletion.…”
Section: Extrapolating the Klf Of The S-star Clustermentioning
confidence: 99%