2016
DOI: 10.4067/s0718-16202016000100009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STEM AND SOIL CO2 Efflux Responses Of Pinus radiata PLANTATIONS TO TEMPERATURE, SEASON, AGE, TIME (DAY/NIGHT) AND FERTILIZATION

Abstract: H.E. Bown, and M.S. Watt. 2016. Stem and soil CO 2 efflux responses of Pinus radiata plantations to temperature, season, age, time (day/night) and fertilization. Cien. Inv. Agr. 43(1):95-109. Stem CO 2 efflux is a highly variable component of the carbon budget of forest ecosystems. It reflects the balance between the CO 2 respired by the living stem tissues, less the CO 2 dissolved in the xylem sap moving upward in the transpiration stream, plus the CO 2 transported from the roots and released at the stem. Alt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The third hypothesis for this study was that fertilization would not influence surface CO 2 efflux as it was carried out 12 years before the measurements. There were no significant effects of fertilization on surface CO 2 emissions in any season during the year which is consistent with research on radiata pine in Chile (Bown and Watt 2016), slash pine in Florida, USA (Shan et al 2001), and loblolly pine in Virginia (Tyree et al 2006) and North Carolina, USA (Maier and Kress 2000). Our study, however, contains only one-year data and the absence of inter-annual variability may prevent finding F s responses to fertilization (Tyree et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The third hypothesis for this study was that fertilization would not influence surface CO 2 efflux as it was carried out 12 years before the measurements. There were no significant effects of fertilization on surface CO 2 emissions in any season during the year which is consistent with research on radiata pine in Chile (Bown and Watt 2016), slash pine in Florida, USA (Shan et al 2001), and loblolly pine in Virginia (Tyree et al 2006) and North Carolina, USA (Maier and Kress 2000). Our study, however, contains only one-year data and the absence of inter-annual variability may prevent finding F s responses to fertilization (Tyree et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Consequently, there are significant differences in temperature under different TIs, thereby supporting the above point of view. E S and temperature are strongly positively correlated (Bown and Watt 2016;Darenova et al 2018;Salomón et al 2019). Therefore, temperature is one of the mechanisms by which thinning affects E S .…”
Section: Seasonality and Ti Variation In E Smentioning
confidence: 99%