1997
DOI: 10.1089/scd.1.1997.6.227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stem Cell Mobilization in Normal Donors

Abstract: We studied peripheral blood and apheresis samples from 39 consecutive normal donors who were parents or siblings of patients who received matched or mismatched bone marrow transplants using a combination of rhG-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) and bone marrow (BM). BM was harvested from donors 1-7 days before starting rhG-CSF treatment: 12 micrograms/kg/day rhG-CSF was administered by continuous s.c. infusion for 4-7 days. Peripheral blood progenitor cells were harvested by leukapheresis using… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hematopoietic Stem Cells Source-HSCs, obtained upon informed consent from donors for allogeneic HSC transplant, were mobilized in the peripheral blood by recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment and collected by superparamagnetic iron-dextran particles directly conjugated to anti-CD34 as previously described (12,15). The purity of the isolated cells was evaluated by flow cytometry using a phycoerythrin-conjugated monoclonal anti-CD34 antibody and challenged against a large panel of antigens characterizing late committed or mature hematopoietic cell types as previously reported (12).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hematopoietic Stem Cells Source-HSCs, obtained upon informed consent from donors for allogeneic HSC transplant, were mobilized in the peripheral blood by recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment and collected by superparamagnetic iron-dextran particles directly conjugated to anti-CD34 as previously described (12,15). The purity of the isolated cells was evaluated by flow cytometry using a phycoerythrin-conjugated monoclonal anti-CD34 antibody and challenged against a large panel of antigens characterizing late committed or mature hematopoietic cell types as previously reported (12).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The larger availability of oxygen, experienced by the mobilized HSC, enables it to be used as the driving substrate for the mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation as well as for other extra-mitochondrial oxidative reactions. In this work we have studied the enzymatic features of the cellular oxygen consuming reactions in human HSCs recovered from peripheral blood, upon mobilization from bone marrow by the growth factor granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (11)(12)(13)(14), and isolated by immunoselection using as cell specific tag the CD34 antigenic marker.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in other series, [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] most of the donors presented some immediate sideeffects, bone pain and headache being the toxicities most frequently observed, although they were easily managed with mild analgesics and resolved promptly after rhG-CSF discontinuation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Finally, in 25 of them (5.3%) such information was not available. Median dose of rhG-CSF administered was 10 g/kg/day (range, [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], with 387 (81.3%) donors receiving 10 g/kg/day. Seventy-two donors received Ͼ10 g/kg/day (median 12 g/kg; range, 10.8-20), and only 17 donors (3.6%) received Ͻ10 g/kg/day (median 5 g/kg; range, 4-9).…”
Section: Rhg-csf Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Although improvements to date have increased our ability to predict early hematopoietic engraftment, to our knowledge no one has evaluated the influence of body weight on PBSC enumeration and engraftment. It was suggested by some studies 25,26 but not others 13,27,28 that obese individuals have greater PBSC yields. The explanation for such variability remains poorly understood and it could be related to different rates of metabolism of growth factors or an artifact of the cell dose calculation in obese patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%