2016
DOI: 10.14448/jsesd.06.00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stemming on STEM: A STEM Education Framework for Students with Disabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the table, we included four STEAM education frameworks as it was found that some of the most recent frameworks in the literature were inclusive of the arts. A review of the STEM and STEAM education frameworks revealed that some focused generally on the integration of the disciplines (e.g., Bybee, 2010;Honey et al, 2014;Kelley & Knowles, 2016;Tan et al, 2019;Yakman, 2011;Yata et al, 2020), several focused on preparation of teachers and workforce development (Lee & Nason, 2012;Reider et al, 2016), two focused on a teaching model (Falloon et al, 2020;Quigley et al, 2017), one on equity and access broadly (Bush & Cook, 2019), and one specifically on students with disabilities (Hwang & Taylor, 2016).…”
Section: Stem Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the table, we included four STEAM education frameworks as it was found that some of the most recent frameworks in the literature were inclusive of the arts. A review of the STEM and STEAM education frameworks revealed that some focused generally on the integration of the disciplines (e.g., Bybee, 2010;Honey et al, 2014;Kelley & Knowles, 2016;Tan et al, 2019;Yakman, 2011;Yata et al, 2020), several focused on preparation of teachers and workforce development (Lee & Nason, 2012;Reider et al, 2016), two focused on a teaching model (Falloon et al, 2020;Quigley et al, 2017), one on equity and access broadly (Bush & Cook, 2019), and one specifically on students with disabilities (Hwang & Taylor, 2016).…”
Section: Stem Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A framework organized as a helix to illustrate the relationship between STEM content development activities, STEM career development activities, teacher professional development, partnerships, and cultural context The STEM Quartet Instructional Framework(Tan et al, 2019) A framework showing the level of connection among the STEM disciplines, with six steps (i.e., identify problem, understand problem, formulate solution, implement solution, review solution, new problem) around the circumference of the visual Relationship Between the Engineering Design Process and Science, Technology, and Mathematics(Yata et al, 2020) A framework that serves to promote interdisciplinary STEM education recognizing the uniqueness and similarities of each STEM discipline, considering how each science, technology, and mathematics are needed in engineering STEAM Interdisciplinary Approach to STEAM Education for Students with Disabilities(Hwang & Taylor, 2016) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ayrıca STEM çalışmalarında karşılaştıkları matematikle ilgili zorlukları gidermek için özel gereksinimi olan öğrencilere STEAM çalışmaları denenerek zorlandıkları alanlara sanat desteği sağlanabilir. Örneğin kesirleri anlamakta ve kullanmakta zorlanan öğrenciye müzik desteğiyle davul çaldırılarak ¾ ya da ¼ 'lük vuruşlarla kesirler arasında bağlantı kurulabilir (Hwang & Taylor, 2016). Bu noktada özel gereksinimli öğrencilerle STEM çalışmak isteyen araştırmacılara çalışmalarına sanat boyutunuda katarak STEAM çalışmaları önerilir.…”
Section: Tartışma Ve Sonuçunclassified
“…have reported that understanding fractions is a strong predictor of students' mathematics achievement in later grades, as it is embedded in advanced mathematics domains (for example, algebra) for all students regardless of ability. In addition, the growing needs of STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) education necessitates learning fractions because fractions are commonly used throughout everyday life (Hwang & Taylor, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%