2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/fie.2015.7344312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Step-based tutoring system for introductory linear circuit analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest quality papers are characterized by replicability, the involvement of multiple researchers, and experimental design which guards against bias. Skromme et al is a particularly good example of control design: students from the same class section are randomly assigned to the experimental or control group, and data is collected from both student performance and student evaluation [7]. The design is strong because experimental and control groups are distinguished by a single variable (application of the teaching method), and a variety of data (grades, surveys) was collected to evaluate the experiment.…”
Section: Coding -Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest quality papers are characterized by replicability, the involvement of multiple researchers, and experimental design which guards against bias. Skromme et al is a particularly good example of control design: students from the same class section are randomly assigned to the experimental or control group, and data is collected from both student performance and student evaluation [7]. The design is strong because experimental and control groups are distinguished by a single variable (application of the teaching method), and a variety of data (grades, surveys) was collected to evaluate the experiment.…”
Section: Coding -Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, step-based systems caused improvements of 0.76σ, compared to 0.31σ and 0.79σ for answer-based systems and human tutors, respectively (σ denotes standard deviation) [1]. Previously, we have described a step-based tutoring system in the domain of linear circuit analysis, which is a crucial gateway course in the education of both electrical and many nonelectrical engineers [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. This system features automatic problem generation, where an unlimited number of unique circuit diagrams (not just element values) are created for every user.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior controlled, randomized experiments have shown a 1.21σ improvement in learning on writing nodal analysis equations and identifying elements in series and parallel in a laboratorybased experiment and a corresponding improvement of 0.91σ in student motivation [3,4]. A classroom-based assessment in Fall 2014 using random assignment to compare this system to complete nodal and mesh analysis exercises to using the commercial WileyPLUS system found a 0.41σ improvement in that homework score (p < 0.008) [7]. It was also observed that 32-34% of WileyPLUS users voluntarily completed additional problems in the step-based system for no credit, whereas no users of the step-based system did the reverse [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3,[15][16][17][18] These problems are presented as diagrams laid out on a square grid (for convenience in avoiding graphical interferences), which can however represent any planar circuit of reasonable size (on a grid of up to 5 × 5 squares). The usable grid size and numbers of nodes, meshes, and each type of circuit element (independent voltage & current sources, dependent sources of both types, resistors, capacitors, inductors, and normally-closed and normally-open single-pole switches) can all be specified (consistent with the relationships that must hold among these quantities).…”
Section: Overview Of Random Problem Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 In the following, recently added modules and capabilities in the program are discussed, which extend the previous work on this system. 2,3,[15][16][17][18] Recent experiments to evaluate the effect of this system on student learning using randomized, controlled trials and to measure student satisfaction with the tool are then described.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%