We illustrate using scanning tunneling microscopy and low energy electron diffraction that thin Al films grown on Si͑111͒-ͱ 3 ϫ ͱ 3-Al substrates form layers having unusual thicknesses, not compatible with a normal fcc stacking of dense Al͑111͒-1 ϫ 1 layers ͑coverageϽ wetting layer+ 7 Å͒. This structure is shown to be based on inserted dilute 1.5ϫ 1.5 atomic layers. At a film thickness of the wetting layer+ 7 Å, the film undergoes a phase transformation and continues to grow in the normal stacking of Al͑111͒-1 ϫ 1 layers. The phenomenon is explained within the theory of the quantum size effects in a jellium metal combined with strain effects. We argue that the insertion of dilute atomic layers for small film thicknesses allows the Al film to reach thicknesses perfectly well adjusted to the minima of the oscillating electron energy, which arises from the spatial confinement of the free electrons in the thin film. In contrast, at larger thicknesses, where the electron energy differences diminish, a strain-driven phase transformation drives the system back to the classical close-packed Al͑111͒-1 ϫ 1 fcc stacking. The isotropic property of the metallic bonding drives metal ions to get as close as possible in order to maximize the overlap of the wave functions and to minimize the energy. Therefore, most metals form close-packed crystalline structures with high coordination numbers. Depending on the shape and extension of the wave functions involved, metals crystallize preferentially in the close-packed face-centered cubic or hexagonal structures or in the nearly close-packed body-centered cubic structure. In the conventional understanding, deviations from this principle should only occur if the bonds between the metal atoms become directional, i.e., exhibit covalent contributions. Here, we demonstrate, however, that a pure single element metal can also form a stack of dilute and dense close-packed atomic layers and thus deviate from the closed-packed principle in dimensionally reduced structures. The driving force is not a directional component of the metallic bond but rather a reduction of the electron energy governed by quantum size effects. Once the gain of electron energy vanishes with increasing film thickness, the whole system undergoes, however, a strain-driven phase transformation from alternating dilute and dense atomic layers to only close-packed layers.Quantum mechanics and thus also quantum size effects ͑QSEs͒ become relevant for spatially confined structures, such as thin metal films, whose thickness is comparable to the Fermi wavelength F . 1-4 Perhaps, the best illustrated example of the QSE are Pb films on Si͑111͒, where various properties, such as the surface energy, the superconducting transition temperature, the interlayer spacing, and the film stability, oscillate with the film thickness. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] The QSE also favors magic film thicknesses, corresponding to the electron energy minima at F / 2 intervals. [6][7][8]12,13 This drives metal thin films with unfavored thicknesses to stabil...