2003
DOI: 10.1002/anie.200351849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stepwise Solid‐Phase Synthesis of Di‐ and Trinuclear Metal Complexes

Abstract: Monodisperse oligomers play a central role in understanding the chemistry and the physics of polymeric organic and inorganic materials.[1] The synthesis of monodisperse oligomers can be achieved by self-organization processes, random synthesis followed by separation processes, or by a step-bystep synthesis. All these strategies present their own advantages and disadvantages. Full control over chain length, end groups, and building-block sequence can be achieved using a stepwise approach. While this strategy is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The immobilised bis(chelate) complex 1b is prepared analogously to 1a employing polymer-supported chelate ligands (Scheme 1 and Scheme 3; ligand loading 0.6-0.8 mmol g -1 polymer; polymer = polystyrene/2 % divinylbenzene). [27][28][29][30][31][32] The amount of molybdenum incorporated by 1b is compatible with the required 2:1 ligand/metal stoichiometry as shown by molybdenum uptake measurements. [23] Thus the molybdenum complexes are anchored to the polymeric backbone by two attachment points which should guarantee the desired site isolation effect (at least for some sites within the polymer).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The immobilised bis(chelate) complex 1b is prepared analogously to 1a employing polymer-supported chelate ligands (Scheme 1 and Scheme 3; ligand loading 0.6-0.8 mmol g -1 polymer; polymer = polystyrene/2 % divinylbenzene). [27][28][29][30][31][32] The amount of molybdenum incorporated by 1b is compatible with the required 2:1 ligand/metal stoichiometry as shown by molybdenum uptake measurements. [23] Thus the molybdenum complexes are anchored to the polymeric backbone by two attachment points which should guarantee the desired site isolation effect (at least for some sites within the polymer).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Cleaving the Si-O bonds of 1b with fluoride ions releases the hydroxy analogue of 1a into solution confirming the correct formation of 1b. [27][28][29][30][31][32] PMe 3 is oxidised by 1b to OPMe 3 as shown by 31 The anchored Mo VI and Mo IV complexes 1b and 3b were subjected to one-electron reduction and oxidation, respectively (CEPT chemistry). Reaction of 1b with cobaltocene Co(C 5 H 5 ) 2 [33] gave polymer 4b which is EPR-active.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For 3b a larger weight loss of 6.1% is observed at 200 °C, which can be accounted for by a loss of three carbon monoxide ligands and one chloro ligand, while the immobilised allyl complexes 4b − 6b only lose coordinated carbonyl ligands up to 200 °C (Table 6). Carbon monoxide loss has also been detected for immobilised Mo 0 carbonyl complexes 12. These data show that these complexes are formed quantitatively on the solid support and that allyl complexes are thermally more stable than the seven‐coordinate molybdenum‐tin complex.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The chelates HL were attached to the copolymer by silylether linkages. These linkers are stable toward hydrolysis but can be cleaved on purpose by fluoride ions to release and analyze the ligand or the respective complex in solution ("active site extraction" [129][130][131][132][133]). OAT from the polymer-anchored Mo(L 5 ) 2 (O) 2 to PMe 3 gives soluble OPMe 3 as shown by 31 [81].…”
Section: O] 2 ( -O) or [Mo(l)o] 2 ( -O) 2 ( -Thf)mentioning
confidence: 99%