2015
DOI: 10.1117/12.2184763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereo matching based on census transformation of image gradients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various approaches have been applied, such as shiftable window and support window [17]- [19]. Still, the support window's rectangular constrained shape having the difficulty at the near the depth discontinuity regions to measure disparity values of the pixels [20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various approaches have been applied, such as shiftable window and support window [17]- [19]. Still, the support window's rectangular constrained shape having the difficulty at the near the depth discontinuity regions to measure disparity values of the pixels [20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using the combination of multiple single similarity measures into a composite similarity measure, it has been proven to be an effective method to calculate the matching cost [7][8][9][10]. The adaptive multi-cost approach proposed in this work defines a novel multi-cost function to calculate the raw matching score and employs an adaptive window aggregation strategy to filter the cost volume.…”
Section: Initial Disparity Map Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to obtain accurate disparity results at near depth discontinuities, an appropriate support window should be constructed. An adaptive cross-based window that relies on a linearly expanded cross skeleton support region for cost aggregation is adopted [7,10,18,28]. The shape of the adaptive support window is visually presented in the fifth line of Figure 4.…”
Section: Cost Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inadequacy of the previous approaches has led to the development of transform‐based matching cost functions. Transform‐based matching cost functions include the soft rank transform (SRT) [4], rank (Rank) and census (Census) transforms [9], modified census (MC) [10], census of the image gradient (CG) [11], cross‐comparison census (CCC) [12], support local binary pattern (SLBP) [13], and centre symmetric census transform (CSCT) [14]. Since transform‐based matching cost functions rely on the relative order of the pixels, they are also invariant under all radiometric changes that preserve the relative order.…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this improvement is less helpful with large support windows. CG [11] increases the toleration to intensity transformations between stereo images by computing Census on the image gradient. CCC and SLBP enhance Census by computing the relationship between pixel pairs that are pixel neighbours of the anchor pixel.…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%