1994
DOI: 10.1021/om00014a053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereochemical Nonrigidity in a Chelated Platinum(0)-Diolefin Complex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fluxional behavior of ( t Bu 3 P)Pt[η 4 -(CH 2 CHSiMe 2 ) 2 O] manifests itself in Si Me 2 signal broadening in the 1 H and 13 C{ 1 H} NMR spectra . We acquired the 1 H NMR spectra of 1a between 294 and 343 K, but no Si Me 2 signal broadening was observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fluxional behavior of ( t Bu 3 P)Pt[η 4 -(CH 2 CHSiMe 2 ) 2 O] manifests itself in Si Me 2 signal broadening in the 1 H and 13 C{ 1 H} NMR spectra . We acquired the 1 H NMR spectra of 1a between 294 and 343 K, but no Si Me 2 signal broadening was observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bidentate dvtms ligand exists in a pseudochair conformation which is a common coordination mode for this ligand. [15][16][17][18] This complex owes its chirality to the fact that the C 2 symmetry of the carbene ligand is broken by the pseudochair conformation adopted by the dvtms ligand. The benzimidazole carbene is tilted by 68u (C20-Pt1-C1-N9 torsion angle) from the plane formed by the Pt centre and the alkene ligands.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence of a direct P−Pt bond was observed in the corresponding 31 P{ 1 H} NMR spectra showing singlets with Pt satellites with large 1 J PPt coupling constants between 3351 and 3622 Hz (Table 1), which are comparable to other phosphine platinum complexes. 21,22 In the molecular structures (Figure 2), the P−Pt distances range between 2.339(2) and 2.3964(8) Å and are thus on the longer end of values reported for analogous phosphine platinum complexes such as (tBu 3 P)Pt(vs) (2.384(2) Å) or ((pTol) 3 P)Pt(vs) (2.292(2) Å). 10,23 Since there is no clear trend between the electronic properties [as measured by their Tolman electronic parameter (TEP), Table 1] of the ligands and the Pt−P distance, we assume that this is mostly due to steric reasons connected with the bulk of the YPhos ligands.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%