2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00025-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereodeficient subjects demonstrate non-linear stereopsis

Abstract: There appear to be two modes of stereoscopic processing: a conventional linear operation that is dependent on correspondence between local luminance components in the two eyes' views, and a non-linear or second-order processing mode. This second mode may use disparity information provided by particular 'non-Fourier' features of the stimulus such as the contrast envelope. Preliminary results suggest that people who fail standard clinical stereotests are able to extract non-linear disparity information from Gabo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is preliminary evidence for the resilience of stereopsis at larger disparities in adults who have disrupted binocular vision. McColl, Ziegler, and Hess (2000) demonstrated that some individuals who are stereoanomalous are able to localize stimuli in depth via coarse disparity signals. Furthermore, Harris, Wilcox, Moroz-Harris, Day, and Smith (2000) found that a subset of their observers with strabismus were able to judge the relative depth of diplopic targets better than visually normal subjects in spite of the fact that they performed very poorly on standard tests of stereopsis.…”
Section: Stereopsis In Atypical Visual Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is preliminary evidence for the resilience of stereopsis at larger disparities in adults who have disrupted binocular vision. McColl, Ziegler, and Hess (2000) demonstrated that some individuals who are stereoanomalous are able to localize stimuli in depth via coarse disparity signals. Furthermore, Harris, Wilcox, Moroz-Harris, Day, and Smith (2000) found that a subset of their observers with strabismus were able to judge the relative depth of diplopic targets better than visually normal subjects in spite of the fact that they performed very poorly on standard tests of stereopsis.…”
Section: Stereopsis In Atypical Visual Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 Strong evidence to support this is found in individuals with strabismus, 56 a condition where the eyes are abnormally aligned. Standard clinical tests suggest that individuals with strabismus are stereo-deficient, however McColl et al (2000) demonstrated that some individuals were still able to perceive depth in their task. Wilcox and Allision (2009) suggest this depth perception was via coarse disparity signals from the second-order mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore it does not require anisometropic amblyopes to utilise the first-order processing of fine detail; it would mainly require the second-order processing of the more coarse information to elicit a good result. As a consequence, anisometropic amblyopes may have the ability to achieve high stereoacuity thresholds with the FNS and struggle to achieve similar stereoacuity thresholds with the TNO (McColl, Ziegler & Hess, 2000;McColl & Mitchell 1998;Giaschi et al, 2013). Conversely, there was also no statistical significance found between IAD and TNO stereoacuity in anisometropic amblyopes.…”
Section: ) Va and Stereoacuitymentioning
confidence: 92%