2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereographic Targeting in Prostate Radiotherapy: Speed and Precision by Daily Automatic Positioning Corrections Using Kilovoltage/Megavoltage Image Pairs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, the segmented markers were jointly registered to the markers in the CBCT scan, based on chamfer matching (16), obtaining translations, and rotations in three dimensions. The accuracy of marker registration, expressed as an average uniform fiducial registration error (FRE), was 0.24 mm, which is in accordance with the FRE found by Mutanga et al (17) The FRE was calculated as the RMS value over all patients of the RMS values over all fractions of the random displacement errors determined in each direction. The FRE is needed to calculate the target registration error (TRE) (see below).…”
Section: Fiducial Marker Registrationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Then, the segmented markers were jointly registered to the markers in the CBCT scan, based on chamfer matching (16), obtaining translations, and rotations in three dimensions. The accuracy of marker registration, expressed as an average uniform fiducial registration error (FRE), was 0.24 mm, which is in accordance with the FRE found by Mutanga et al (17) The FRE was calculated as the RMS value over all patients of the RMS values over all fractions of the random displacement errors determined in each direction. The FRE is needed to calculate the target registration error (TRE) (see below).…”
Section: Fiducial Marker Registrationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The corresponding residue displacements, as reported in this study, were added in quadrature to the S and s values of COM displacements remaining after SGT correction (21). The latter contribution consisted of the small residue errors (S #0.5 mm, s #0.8 mm in each direction) directly after on-line correction (8), as well as those caused by intrafraction motion. Kotte et al (22) performed a markerbased study on prostate intrafraction motion in 427 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter displacements depend not only on the CTV shape, but also on the behavior of the seminal vesicle deformation in the presence of prostate rotations. Knowledge of these displacements is clinically relevant because on-line corrections are often limited to translation corrections (8,10). To our knowledge, this is the first study to quantify these rotation deviations in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations