2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.06.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases from small cell lung cancer without prior whole-brain radiotherapy: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, brain as a special site of progression, the choice of local therapy or systemic therapy as the primary treatment has not been determined [21][22][23][24][25][26]. Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is now the standard treatment in many guidelines [1,10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, brain as a special site of progression, the choice of local therapy or systemic therapy as the primary treatment has not been determined [21][22][23][24][25][26]. Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is now the standard treatment in many guidelines [1,10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is now the standard treatment in many guidelines [1,10]. For the patients with limited number of BMs, additional radiation boost to WBRT or stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) can be recommended [21,23,25]. Several studies suggested that the occurrence of brain metastasis was a sign of systemic failure of tumor control, the treatment of brain metastasis should focus on chemoradiotherapy [27][28][29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This risk theoretically increases with the number of metastases, as it might represent a surrogate for the overall extent of intracranial disease, both macroscopic and microscopic. However, recent literature in support of SRS compared to WBRT calls into question whether this potential for increased intracranial control is worth the added toxicity if a patient can be closely monitored with serial MRI and undergo additional salvage radiation if needed [ 10 , 11 ]. However, the use of SRS for more than 15 lesions, particularly with SCLC histology, rightly remains highly controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While, as expected, intracranial control was inferior in patients treated with SRS, overall survival (OS) was actually improved in patients receiving SRS. In subsequent meta-analyses by Gaebe et al [ 10 ] and Viani et al [ 11 ], these results were replicated, with SRS being associated with an improvement in OS, thereby establishing SRS as a viable treatment option. Importantly, these studies are limited by the inclusion of retrospective studies and associated selection bias but still support consideration of SRS in future studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Approximately 10–25% of patients with SCLC have symptomatic or asymptomatic brain metastases at initial diagnosis, and more than 50% will develop brain metastases during the disease course ( 2 ). Radiotherapy is commonly used for the treatment of brain metastases from SCLC, with a local control rate up to 93% ( 3 ). However, the survival was still dismal, with a 12-month overall survival (OS) rate of 39% ( 3 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%