2004
DOI: 10.1177/0146167203259937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sticks and Stones Can Break My Bones, But Ethnophaulisms Can Alter the Portrayal of Immigrants to Children

Abstract: An archival study examined the portrayal of ethnic immigrants to children as a function of the prevailing cognitive representation of those ethnic immigrant groups in ethnophaulisms. The complexity in ethnophaulisms (and, to a lesser degree, the valence in ethnophaulisms) predicted the portrayal of ethnic immigrant groups. Overall, ethnic immigrant groups characterized in terms of ethnophaulisms of low complexity were less frequently present in children's literature, children from these ethnic groups were desc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The interpretation of Dodd et al (1989) is essentially the same hypothesis developed earlier by Eagly & Steffen (1984) to explain gender stereotypes: Women tend to be seen as more communal because women are more likely to hold positions of low dominance; men tend to be seen as more agentic because men are more likely to hold positions of high dominance. This possibility is logically consistent with research findings indicating that lower facial prominence is observed for targets in positions of low dominance (e.g., Archer et al, 1983;Mullen, 2004;Zuckerman, 1986;Zuckerman & Kieffer, 1994). Moreover, this is the only interpretation proposed to date that is also consistent with the results of the present study.…”
Section: Implications For Facial Prominence Effectssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The interpretation of Dodd et al (1989) is essentially the same hypothesis developed earlier by Eagly & Steffen (1984) to explain gender stereotypes: Women tend to be seen as more communal because women are more likely to hold positions of low dominance; men tend to be seen as more agentic because men are more likely to hold positions of high dominance. This possibility is logically consistent with research findings indicating that lower facial prominence is observed for targets in positions of low dominance (e.g., Archer et al, 1983;Mullen, 2004;Zuckerman, 1986;Zuckerman & Kieffer, 1994). Moreover, this is the only interpretation proposed to date that is also consistent with the results of the present study.…”
Section: Implications For Facial Prominence Effectssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…For example, just as low facial prominence is associated with diminished intelligence (Archer et al, 1983;Schwartz & Kurz, 1989), low verbal complexity is also associated with diminished intelligence (Kaldegg, 1950;Tillman, 1969). Mullen (2004) recently showed that ethnic immigrant characters in children's books were derogated through portrayals of both low facial prominence and low verbal complexity. This suggests that cartoonists' efforts to enhance or derogate the target would be observed in changes in the verbal complexity of the target as a function of the onset of war.…”
Section: Verbal Complexity and Portrayals In Political Cartoonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Su trabajo demuestra que el discurso narrativo referido a personajes de raza blanca es utilizado para situar estos personajes en el centro y núcleo de la acción narrativa. Del mismo modo, Mullen (2004) describe casos de etnofaulismo en textos de LI en los que personajes de una etnia concreta son dibujados con cabezas pequeñas y con un discurso verbal muy simple. Esta investigación es una contribución a la mejora de las relaciones intergrupales entre niños.…”
Section: Y Estereotipos De Génerounclassified