2022
DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Still divergent but on the way to convergence: clinical practice of CNS germ cell tumors in Europe and North America from the perspectives of the East

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Little is known about the clinical and histopathological presentations for GCTs at atypical sites, much less for medulla oblongata GCTs, particularly in terms of clinical behaviors. While chemotherapy (CMT) regimens and radiation fields have been historically investigated for GCTs at typical sites in multiple clinical trials worldwide [10,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], the most appropriate treatment strategies, such as optimal radiation field based on relapse patterns, remain poorly characterized [25]. Germinomas at atypical sites outside of these midline structures have been known to show worse prognoses than those at typical sites [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little is known about the clinical and histopathological presentations for GCTs at atypical sites, much less for medulla oblongata GCTs, particularly in terms of clinical behaviors. While chemotherapy (CMT) regimens and radiation fields have been historically investigated for GCTs at typical sites in multiple clinical trials worldwide [10,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], the most appropriate treatment strategies, such as optimal radiation field based on relapse patterns, remain poorly characterized [25]. Germinomas at atypical sites outside of these midline structures have been known to show worse prognoses than those at typical sites [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In tandem, histopathological diagnosis based on a small biopsy specimen predisposes to sampling error and associated under-estimation in the prevalence of malignant components. Collectively, these complexities have yielded a highly heterogenous set of protocols with regard to how tumor markers are incorporated into algorithms for GCT diagnosis and treatment across the world [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If tumor markers are elevated, patients are diagnosed with NGGCTs; if not, patients require a biopsy for histopathological diagnosis ( 6 10 ). In Japan, treatment stratification is unique in that it is based on three prognostic subgroups (i.e., germinoma, intermediate prognosis, and poor prognosis subgroups) that are determined according to histopathological confirmation ( Table 1 ) ( 11 , 12 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If tumor markers are elevated, patients are diagnosed with NGGCTs; if not, patients require a biopsy for histopathological diagnosis (6)(7)(8)(9)(10). In Japan, treatment stratification is unique in that it is based on three prognostic subgroups (i.e., germinoma, intermediate prognosis, and poor prognosis subgroups) that are determined according to histopathological confirmation (Table 1) (11,12). One of the ongoing issues in treatment and patient care is that treatment stratification is currently mostly limited to two or three categories and predictive biomarkers for guiding personalized treatment are presently scarce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%