2011
DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2011-100031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stillbirth and residential proximity to extremely low frequency power transmission lines: a retrospective cohort study: Table 1

Abstract: A graded dose-response trend between distance to lines and odds of stillbirth was not found, but the likelihood of term stillbirth was elevated for residences within 25 m of power transmission lines. Residential proximity to transmission lines is unlikely to be associated with stillbirth, but more research is needed to rule out a possible link.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some uncertainty was due to the fact that the address was available only at time of birth, and lack of information on powerline voltage, earlier reproductive outcomes or lifestyle factors such as smoking. A similar analysis was conducted for stillbirths in 1998-2007 (Auger et al 2012). The material consisted of 2033 stillbirths, also including pregnancy terminations due to foetal anomalies (foetal death with weight ≥500g regardless of gestational age) and more than 500,000 live births (singletons only for both categories).…”
Section: Reproductive Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some uncertainty was due to the fact that the address was available only at time of birth, and lack of information on powerline voltage, earlier reproductive outcomes or lifestyle factors such as smoking. A similar analysis was conducted for stillbirths in 1998-2007 (Auger et al 2012). The material consisted of 2033 stillbirths, also including pregnancy terminations due to foetal anomalies (foetal death with weight ≥500g regardless of gestational age) and more than 500,000 live births (singletons only for both categories).…”
Section: Reproductive Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work by Auger et al [ did not find strong evidence of an association between proximity to transmission lines and PTB, LBW, small for gestational age (SGA) or on sex ratio, but did observe a statistically significant 4% increased risk for SGA for less than 50 m distance from power transmission lines in unadjusted analyses. Further analyses of these data in relation to stillbirths [Auger et al, ] did not indicate statistically significant increased risks nor clear distance‐effect associations, but increased risk estimates were again observed for <25 m proximity. Amongst populations occupationally exposed to strong static and ELF‐EMF, reduced male proportions of offspring have also been reported [Irgens et al, ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recommended distance for 132 kV line is about 15 to 20 m [17][18]. However there are several reports were published indicating possible link between exposure to ELF and leukemia [19], miscarriage risk [20] and neurodegenerative diseases [21] even with a greater distance than recommended one.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%