1956
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stimulation of spinal motoneurones with intracellular electrodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
156
0

Year Published

1958
1958
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 291 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
156
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shortly after the development of intracellular recording and stimulation techniques, it was noted that in spinal motoneurons the trajectory of the rise and fall of the membrane potential in response to rectangular current injection (Araki and Otani, 1955;Coombs et al, 1956), the strength-latency curve (Frank and Fuortes, 1956), and the decay of EPSPs and IPSPs (Coombs et al, 1956) were all close to having an exponential profile. These effects were related to the membrane time constant.…”
Section: The Role Of Motoneuron Dendrites In Repetitive Firingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shortly after the development of intracellular recording and stimulation techniques, it was noted that in spinal motoneurons the trajectory of the rise and fall of the membrane potential in response to rectangular current injection (Araki and Otani, 1955;Coombs et al, 1956), the strength-latency curve (Frank and Fuortes, 1956), and the decay of EPSPs and IPSPs (Coombs et al, 1956) were all close to having an exponential profile. These effects were related to the membrane time constant.…”
Section: The Role Of Motoneuron Dendrites In Repetitive Firingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The input resistance of the afferents averaged 8.5 M⍀ (Ϯ0.63 SEM; n ϭ 29). Because of the fast time constant of the afferent fibers (comparable with that of the M-cell, estimated in ϳ400 sec) (Fukami et al, 1964), the bridge was balanced using the spikeheight method (Frank and Fuortes, 1956). The M-cell resting and action potentials averaged Ϫ76.3 Ϯ 1.3 and 21.2 Ϯ 1.1 mV (SEM; n ϭ 23), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resting potential was measured periodically during the impalement and an average calculated. Input impedance was measured by the bridge imbalance method (Araki and Otani, 1955;Frank and Fuortes, 1956). In most cases, the bridge was balanced outside of the cell and then, following impalement, the voltage offset produced by a 10 msec, 1.2 nA microelectrode negative square wave was measured.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%