1974
DOI: 10.3758/bf03199134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stimulus change and complexity in exploratory behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1975
1975
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though every group reached asymptote at more than 90% preference for the target animal, the stressed animals reached that asymptote faster. Rats learn a T-maze discrimination faster when the reward is large than when it is smaller, though the performance under both reward conditions ultimately reach asymptote at similar levels (Hill & Spear, 1963;Taylor, 1974). Given the results of Experiments 1 and 2, a reasonable suggestion is that part of the attraction provided by the target males in Experiment 3 was their capacity to reduce the aversiveness of an emotional stimulus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though every group reached asymptote at more than 90% preference for the target animal, the stressed animals reached that asymptote faster. Rats learn a T-maze discrimination faster when the reward is large than when it is smaller, though the performance under both reward conditions ultimately reach asymptote at similar levels (Hill & Spear, 1963;Taylor, 1974). Given the results of Experiments 1 and 2, a reasonable suggestion is that part of the attraction provided by the target males in Experiment 3 was their capacity to reduce the aversiveness of an emotional stimulus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Apparatus, A Plexiglas T-maze with 1 29-m runway and .51-m arms was the primary apparatus (Taylor, 1974) One of the arms was painted white, the other was painted black, and the stem was gray The floor of the maze consisted of stainless steel tubing, .63 cm in diameter The start box and the goal boxes each measured 22 X 12 X 16 5 cm. Five opaque doors, each 12 x 16.5 cm, were raised and lowered manually The doors were located after the start box, at the beginning of each of the arms, and immediately preceding each goal area An opaque observation cage, 47 X 25 X 20 cm, was used to establish the relative aggressiveness of the ratt> The 2 5-cm hardware-cloth top allowed the experimenter to view the interacting animals Finally, a regular operant box, 22 X 23 X 22 cm, was used to expose some rats to the same white noise employed in Experiment 1 The operant box was housed in a soundproof cubicle.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, when general activity is high, shelter seeking is subordinated in the short run by a tendency to seek environments (or stimulus levels) moderately discrepant from the currently occupied (and presumably adapted) environment. In a relatively chronic short-term (discrete trial) testing situation, Taylor (1974) reports that both incremental and decremental shifts from a well-adapted midcomplexity stimulus constitute effective incentives for approach, although the incremental shift is more effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wooden T -maze (see Taylor, 1974) with 1.29-m runway and .57 -m arms, one of which was painted white and the other black, was used. The startbox measured 24 x 11.6 x 16.8 em and the goalbox was 25 x 11.6 x 16.8 cm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%