1967
DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1967.10543825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stimulus Characteristics and Spatial Encoding in Sequential Short-Term Memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

1968
1968
1973
1973

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the results of the present study are in agreement with the previous findings of Monty et al (1967) and Monty, Taub, and Laughery (1965). That is, the same general functions of trial length and practice were demonstrated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In general, the results of the present study are in agreement with the previous findings of Monty et al (1967) and Monty, Taub, and Laughery (1965). That is, the same general functions of trial length and practice were demonstrated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Apparatus.-The apparatus for the visual presentations have been described more fully elsewhere (Monty, Fisher, & Karsh, 1967). Stimuli, the letters Q, R, S, and T, were projected one at a time onto the viewing surface of a single Industrial Electronics Engineers rear-projection display unit.…”
Section: Experiments I Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the results of the present study are in agreement with previous studies by Monty (1968); Monty, Fisher, and Karsh (1967); and Monty, Taub, and Laughery (1965). That is, the same general relationships as a function of presentation rate, trial length, and practice are evident in all four studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In a number of previous studies, 5"s were required to tally mentally the number of occurrences of each of several different stimuli presented visually in sequences of varying length and to report their running mental tallies at the end of each sequence. In keeping-track tasks of this nature it has been found that memory processes, especially encoding and rehearsal strategies, are a major determinent of performance (Monty, 1968;Monty, Fisher, &Karsh, 1967;Taub, Monty, &Laughery, 1967).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%