1968
DOI: 10.3758/bf03331412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stimulus duration and the human heart rate response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

5
5
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Possibly this is the result of using brief stimuli of moderate intensity. Such an interpretation would conform with evidence that both longer duration (Smith & Strawbridge, 1968) and more intense stimuli (Davis et al, 1955;Lang & Hnatiow, 1962) tend to accentuate this aspect of the response. The possibility should be considered that this secondary deceleration represents the same process as the initial deceleratory phase, the former simply being completion of the latter.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Possibly this is the result of using brief stimuli of moderate intensity. Such an interpretation would conform with evidence that both longer duration (Smith & Strawbridge, 1968) and more intense stimuli (Davis et al, 1955;Lang & Hnatiow, 1962) tend to accentuate this aspect of the response. The possibility should be considered that this secondary deceleration represents the same process as the initial deceleratory phase, the former simply being completion of the latter.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The cross trial changes observed here agree essentially with earlier findings. The persistence of HR acceleration following an auditory stimulus has frequently been reported (Lang & Hnatiow, 1962;Meyers & Gullickson, 1967;Smith & Strawbridge, 1968). For the light flash the change from a predominantly deceleratory response on initial trials to a predominantly acceleratory one on later trials is similar to the cross trial changes observed by Geer (1964) to a visual CS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations