2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stimulus-independent neural coding of event semantics: Evidence from cross-sentence fMRI decoding

Abstract: Multivariate neuroimaging studies indicate that the brain represents word and object concepts in a format that readily generalises across stimuli. Here we investigated whether this was true for neural representations of simple events described using sentences. Participants viewed sentences describing four events in different ways. Multivariate classifiers were trained to discriminate the four events using a subset of sentences, allowing us to test generalisation to novel sentences. We found that neural pattern… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 83 publications
(106 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Standard sequences yield especially poor signal in orbitofrontal and ventral anterior temporal regions thought critical to semantic cognition [127]. Strategies for improving signal, including distortion-corrected spin-echo [127,128] and multi-echo protocols [129,130], have been available for several years but have only rarely been applied in semantic studies [131]. Indeed, many studies have restricted the field of view to exclude ventral ATL completely [132].…”
Section: Box 2: Implications Of Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard sequences yield especially poor signal in orbitofrontal and ventral anterior temporal regions thought critical to semantic cognition [127]. Strategies for improving signal, including distortion-corrected spin-echo [127,128] and multi-echo protocols [129,130], have been available for several years but have only rarely been applied in semantic studies [131]. Indeed, many studies have restricted the field of view to exclude ventral ATL completely [132].…”
Section: Box 2: Implications Of Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%