2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stimulus-Related Independent Component and Voxel-Wise Analysis of Human Brain Activity during Free Viewing of a Feature Film

Abstract: Understanding how the brain processes stimuli in a rich natural environment is a fundamental goal of neuroscience. Here, we showed a feature film to 10 healthy volunteers during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of hemodynamic brain activity. We then annotated auditory and visual features of the motion picture to inform analysis of the hemodynamic data. The annotations were fitted to both voxel-wise data and brain network time courses extracted by independent component analysis (ICA). Auditory annot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of reinforcement enhancing effects of nicotine in humans via a source other than cigarette smoking. Nicotine’s effects on striatum may be relevant, as visual rewards may differentially activate striatum compared to others (Aharon et al, 2001; Lahnakoski et al, 2012), including monetary reward (Thut et al, 1997). Although speculative, enhancing reinforcement from video reward could partly help account for some of the growing appeal of nicotine e-cigarette use, especially if that use often occurs just before or during “leisure” activities, as is common with tobacco smoking (e.g., Hatsukami et al, 1990; Raiff et al, 2012; van Gucht et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of reinforcement enhancing effects of nicotine in humans via a source other than cigarette smoking. Nicotine’s effects on striatum may be relevant, as visual rewards may differentially activate striatum compared to others (Aharon et al, 2001; Lahnakoski et al, 2012), including monetary reward (Thut et al, 1997). Although speculative, enhancing reinforcement from video reward could partly help account for some of the growing appeal of nicotine e-cigarette use, especially if that use often occurs just before or during “leisure” activities, as is common with tobacco smoking (e.g., Hatsukami et al, 1990; Raiff et al, 2012; van Gucht et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard preprocessing steps were performed with FSL (for more details, see Lahnakoski et al, 2012) and all subjects were co-registered to the MNI 152 two-millimeter template. We performed two types of analyses using ROIs and whole-brain data.…”
Section: Data and Comparison Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the apparent complexity and unrestrained nature of movies, consistent and synchronized brain activity patterns across movie viewers have been demonstrated with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI; e.g. Hasson et al, 2004, Bartels and Zeki, 2004aBartels and Zeki, 2004b;J€ a€ askel€ ainen et al, 2008;Lahnakoski et al, 2012;Nummenmaa et al, 2012;Pamilo et al, 2012;Kauttonen et al, 2015), and more recently with magnetoencephalography (MEG; Betti et al, 2013;Lankinen et al, 2014Lankinen et al, , 2016Chang et al, 2015) and electroencephalography (EEG; Whittingstall et al, 2010;Dmochowski et al, 2012Dmochowski et al, , 2014Bridwell et al, 2015;Chang et al, 2015;Ki et al, 2016;Cohen and Parra, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…J€ a€ askel€ ainen et al, 2008;Golland et al, 2007;Kauppi et al, 2010Kauppi et al, , 2017Nummenmaa et al, 2012;Lahnakoski et al, 2012). Compared with the strong across-viewers correlations in BOLD signals (up to 0.78 in Kauppi et al, 2010), the correspondingly calculated intersubject correlations of MEG or EEG signals are usually weaker (typically less than 0.1) both at sensor (Bridwell et al, 2015) and source level (Suppanen, 2014;Chang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%