“…However, in an imaging study of the ED/ID task, while extra-dimensional shifts were associated with DLPFC function, reversal learning was associated with caudate activation, while the association with orbitofrontal function was not confirmed (Rogers et al 2000). Our findings are, however, consistent with neurological lesions of the OFC or caudate, in which patients' behaviour is strongly influenced or cued by the environment reflecting an inability to modify responses to previously learned stimulus-response associations (Lhermitte et al 1986;Rudd et al 1998). Our findings of a relationship between reversal learning on the set-shifting task and disorganization symptoms and behaviours, independent of working memory, are consistent with hypotheses that these phenomena are related to dysfunction of the circuitry involving orbitofrontal cortex and caudate, namely orbitofrontal-striatal-thalamic systems (Robbins, 1990 ;Pantelis et al 1992 ;Pantelis & Brewer, 1995, 1996, and are consistent with some (Liddle & Morris, 1991), though not all empirical studies (Norman et al 1997 ;Baxter & Liddle, 1998).…”