1998
DOI: 10.1080/135468098396107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stimulus Relevance in Eliciting Utilisation Behaviour: Case Study in a Patient with a Caudate Lesion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in an imaging study of the ED/ID task, while extra-dimensional shifts were associated with DLPFC function, reversal learning was associated with caudate activation, while the association with orbitofrontal function was not confirmed (Rogers et al 2000). Our findings are, however, consistent with neurological lesions of the OFC or caudate, in which patients' behaviour is strongly influenced or cued by the environment reflecting an inability to modify responses to previously learned stimulus-response associations (Lhermitte et al 1986;Rudd et al 1998). Our findings of a relationship between reversal learning on the set-shifting task and disorganization symptoms and behaviours, independent of working memory, are consistent with hypotheses that these phenomena are related to dysfunction of the circuitry involving orbitofrontal cortex and caudate, namely orbitofrontal-striatal-thalamic systems (Robbins, 1990 ;Pantelis et al 1992 ;Pantelis & Brewer, 1995, 1996, and are consistent with some (Liddle & Morris, 1991), though not all empirical studies (Norman et al 1997 ;Baxter & Liddle, 1998).…”
Section: Attentional Set-shifting Ability and Disorganization Syndromescontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…However, in an imaging study of the ED/ID task, while extra-dimensional shifts were associated with DLPFC function, reversal learning was associated with caudate activation, while the association with orbitofrontal function was not confirmed (Rogers et al 2000). Our findings are, however, consistent with neurological lesions of the OFC or caudate, in which patients' behaviour is strongly influenced or cued by the environment reflecting an inability to modify responses to previously learned stimulus-response associations (Lhermitte et al 1986;Rudd et al 1998). Our findings of a relationship between reversal learning on the set-shifting task and disorganization symptoms and behaviours, independent of working memory, are consistent with hypotheses that these phenomena are related to dysfunction of the circuitry involving orbitofrontal cortex and caudate, namely orbitofrontal-striatal-thalamic systems (Robbins, 1990 ;Pantelis et al 1992 ;Pantelis & Brewer, 1995, 1996, and are consistent with some (Liddle & Morris, 1991), though not all empirical studies (Norman et al 1997 ;Baxter & Liddle, 1998).…”
Section: Attentional Set-shifting Ability and Disorganization Syndromescontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Thus, the chronic ischemia of Moyamoya disease may accentuate the picture of disinhibition and related neuropsychological deficits that are well documented in schizophrenia (Pantelis et al, 2001). Further, abnormal basal ganglia function, that has been described in Moyamoya disease (Kuroda et al, 1995), may also help explain the psychotic symptoms and perhaps the observed medication sensitivity, and has also been linked to stimulus-driven behavior (Rudd et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Pathologies in which such errors are enhanced are revealing. Adults with brain damage in areas such as the frontal lobes can be very prone to inappropriately performing habitual actions elicited by stimuli, such as involuntarily answering someone else’s telephone despite instructions to the contrary (Humphreys & Riddoch, 2003; Rudd et al, 1998; Scepkowski & Cronin-Golomb, 2003). Such patients provide a clear demonstration of how processes governing goal-directed action can operate independently of decision-making processes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%